These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1523928)

  • 1. Cytobrush and wooden spatula for oral exfoliative cytology. A comparison.
    Ogden GR; Cowpe JG; Green M
    Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(5):706-10. PubMed ID: 1523928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exfoliative cytology of the oral mucosa: comparison of two collection methods.
    Queiroz JB; Lima CF; Burim RA; Brandao AA; Cabral LA; Almeida JD
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(5):e196-9. PubMed ID: 20829152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Cytobrush Plus cell collector in oral cytology.
    Jones AC; Pink FE; Sandow PL; Stewart CM; Migliorati CA; Baughman RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 8108108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do gelatin-coated slides increase cellular retention in oral exfoliative cytology?
    Ogden GR; Nairn A; Franks J; Cowpe JG; Green M
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(2):186-8. PubMed ID: 2028692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of spatula and cytobrush cytological techniques in early detection of oral malignant and premalignant lesions: a prospective and blinded study.
    Nanayakkara PG; Dissanayaka WL; Nanayakkara BG; Amaratunga EA; Tilakaratne WM
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Apr; 45(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 26403502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of keratinization and AgNORs count in exfoliative cytology of normal oral mucosa from smokers and non-smokers.
    Orellana-Bustos AI; Espinoza-Santander IL; Franco-Martínez ME; Lobos-James-Freyre N; Ortega-Pinto AV
    Med Oral; 2004; 9(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 15122120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three sampling instruments, Cytobrush, Curette and OralCDx, for liquid-based cytology of the oral mucosa.
    Reboiras-López MD; Pérez-Sayáns M; Somoza-Martín JM; Antúnez-López JR; Gándara-Vila P; Gayoso-Diz P; Gándara-Rey JM; García-García A
    Biotech Histochem; 2012 Jan; 87(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 21341980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oral rinse as a simpler approach to exfoliative cytology: a comparative study.
    Mulki S; Shetty P; Pai P
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Dec; 7(12):3036-8. PubMed ID: 24551721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Cytobrush®, dermatological curette and oral CDx® brush test as methods for obtaining samples of RNA for molecular analysis of oral cytology.
    Reboiras-López MD; Pérez-Sayáns M; Somoza-Martín JM; Gayoso-Diz P; Barros-Angueira F; Gándara-Rey JM; García-García A
    Cytopathology; 2012 Jun; 23(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 21410796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
    Tyau L; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Edmonds P
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L; Jordan J
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T; Knight AL; Elswick RK
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of liquid-based oral cytology on the diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma.
    Navone R; Burlo P; Pich A; Pentenero M; Broccoletti R; Marsico A; Gandolfo S
    Cytopathology; 2007 Dec; 18(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 18031448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush.
    Maeda MY; Longatto Filho A; Santos DR; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS; De Andrea Filho A
    Pathologica; 1991; 83(1083):105-9. PubMed ID: 1714070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
    Lai-Goldman M; Nieberg RK; Mulcahy D; Wiesmeier E
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.