These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15239365)

  • 1. Discovery rule in medical malpractice under the Federal Tort Claims Act: the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Kubrick was not meant to be secondary authority.
    Zajdel C
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 20(2):443-66. PubMed ID: 15239365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Woodruff v. Covington--physicians associated with federally funded health-care programs may not be immune to claims brought under Federal Tort Claims Act.
    Lee J
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):622-4. PubMed ID: 16240746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A national medical malpractice reform act (and why the Supreme Court may prefer to avoid it).
    Razook N
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2006 Feb; (322):9-36. PubMed ID: 16688930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The wrongful birth tort: a policy analysis and the right to sue for an inconvenient child.
    Granchi JR
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2004 Jul; (303):9-35. PubMed ID: 15455994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The modern-day Nuremburg defense. The Federal Tort Claims Act, the Public Health Service Act, and immunity for those who violate the constitution.
    Hummert C
    J Leg Med; 2012 Jan; 33(1):149-70. PubMed ID: 22439713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why the Supreme Court race is important.
    Schulte DJ
    Mich Med; 2012; 111(5):4. PubMed ID: 23167039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical malpractice and tort reform.
    Berry MD
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2013 Dec; ():1-18. PubMed ID: 24482882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Administrative "health courts" for medical injury claims: the federal constitutional issues.
    Elliott ED; Narayan SA; Nasmith MS
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2008 Aug; 33(4):761-98. PubMed ID: 18617674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. States' Rights, Gun Violence Litigation, and Tort Immunity.
    Higgins HJ; Lowy JE; Rising AJ
    J Law Med Ethics; 2020 Dec; 48(4_suppl):83-89. PubMed ID: 33404317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Good law from tragic facts--Congress, the FDA, and preemption.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Sep; 361(12):1206-11. PubMed ID: 19759383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Caps on malpractice awards: update.
    Allen BL; Fischer JE
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1999 Jun; 84(6):14-9. PubMed ID: 11143204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rationing medical resources: a constitutional, legal, and policy analysis.
    Blumstein JF
    Tex Law Rev; 1981 Nov; 59(8):1345-400. PubMed ID: 11650622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.
    Melnick RL
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 16030335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do we still need a federal patients' bill of rights?
    Law SA
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2002; 3(1):1-34. PubMed ID: 12825425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of Wyeth v. Levine on FDA regulation of prescription drugs.
    Ausness RC
    Food Drug Law J; 2010; 65(2):247-83, i-ii. PubMed ID: 24475542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HIPAA requirement preempting civil discovery rules in malpractice and related suits significant.
    Threlkeld RC
    J Med Assoc Ga; 2008; 97(4):25. PubMed ID: 19288669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
    Berger MA
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. All options on table in wake of Supreme Court decision.
    Busalacchi S
    WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 16218306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Supreme Court's surprising decision on the Medicaid expansion: how will the federal government and states proceed?
    Rosenbaum S; Westmoreland TM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Aug; 31(8):1663-72. PubMed ID: 22869643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Definition of spouse under the Family and Medical Leave Act. Final rule.
    Wager and Hour Division, Department of Labor
    Fed Regist; 2015 Feb; 80(37):9989-10001. PubMed ID: 25898422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.