157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15239912)
21. Clinical audit of the process of referral to genitourinary medicine of patients found to be chlamydia positive in a family planning service.
Tobin JM; Bateman J; Banks B; Jeffs J
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jan; 24(4):160-3. PubMed ID: 10023102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Understanding the acceptability, barriers and facilitators for chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening in technical colleges: qualitative process evaluation of the "Test n Treat" trial.
Fleming C; Drennan VM; Kerry-Barnard S; Reid F; Adams EJ; Sadiq ST; Phillips R; Majewska W; Harding-Esch EM; Cousins EC; Yoward F; Oakeshott P
BMC Public Health; 2020 Aug; 20(1):1212. PubMed ID: 32770977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Chlamydia screening in a rural population: access, outcomes and health-care planning.
Bendall RP; Keane FE; Barlow MJ; Paynter SJ
Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Feb; 18(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 17331278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. I: acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings.
Pimenta JM; Catchpole M; Rogers PA; Perkins E; Jackson N; Carlisle C; Randall S; Hopwood J; Hewitt G; Underhill G; Mallinson H; McLean L; Gleave T; Tobin J; Harindra V; Ghosh A
Sex Transm Infect; 2003 Feb; 79(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 12576607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interactive workshops increase chlamydia testing in primary care--a controlled study.
McNulty CA; Thomas M; Bowen J; Buckley C; Charlett A; Gelb D; Foy C; Sloss J; Smellie S
Fam Pract; 2008 Aug; 25(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 18579709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.
LaMontagne DS; Fenton KA; Randall S; Anderson S; Carter P
Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 15459399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. General practitioners' views on the screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection and partner notification.
Joshi UY; Dixon W
Int J STD AIDS; 2000 Sep; 11(9):588-91. PubMed ID: 10997501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Chlamydia trachomatis testing in the second British national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles: respondent uptake and treatment outcomes.
McCadden A; Fenton KA; McManus S; Mercer CH; Erens B; Carder C; Ridgway G; Macdowall W; Nanchahal K; Byron CL; Copas A; Wellings K; Johnson AM
Sex Transm Dis; 2005 Jun; 32(6):387-94. PubMed ID: 15912087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design.
Low N; McCarthy A; Macleod J; Salisbury C; Horner PJ; Roberts TE; Campbell R; Herring A; Skidmore S; Sanford E; Sterne JA; Davey Smith G; Graham A; Huengsberg M; Ross J; Egger M
Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 15459400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study.
Macleod J; Salisbury C; Low N; McCarthy A; Sterne JA; Holloway A; Patel R; Sanford E; Morcom A; Horner P; Davey Smith G; Skidmore S; Herring A; Caul O; Hobbs FD; Egger M
BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7497):940. PubMed ID: 15809231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Application of the COM-B model to barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice for young people and primary care practitioners: a systematic review.
McDonagh LK; Saunders JM; Cassell J; Curtis T; Bastaki H; Hartney T; Rait G
Implement Sci; 2018 Oct; 13(1):130. PubMed ID: 30348165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk assessment and other screening options for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections in women attending rural Tanzanian antenatal clinics.
Mayaud P; Grosskurth H; Changalucha J; Todd J; West B; Gabone R; Senkoro K; Rusizoka M; Laga M; Hayes R
Bull World Health Organ; 1995; 73(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 8846488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Using educational outreach and a financial incentive to increase general practices' contribution to chlamydia screening in South-East London 2003-2011.
Kalwij S; French S; Mugezi R; Baraitser P
BMC Public Health; 2012 Sep; 12():802. PubMed ID: 22984897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection - a study on testing in general practice.
Spillman M; Cheffins T; Buhrer-Skinner M; Heal C; Larkins S
Aust Fam Physician; 2012 Oct; 41(10):811-3. PubMed ID: 23210107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Testing for Chlamydia and sexual history taking in adolescent females: results from a statewide survey of Colorado primary care providers.
Torkko KC; Gershman K; Crane LA; Hamman R; Barón A
Pediatrics; 2000 Sep; 106(3):E32. PubMed ID: 10969116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection.
Low N; McCarthy A; Macleod J; Salisbury C; Campbell R; Roberts TE; Horner P; Skidmore S; Sterne JA; Sanford E; Ibrahim F; Holloway A; Patel R; Barton PM; Robinson SM; Mills N; Graham A; Herring A; Caul EO; Davey Smith G; Hobbs FD; Ross JD; Egger M;
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(8):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-165. PubMed ID: 17311735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in General Practice.
Pavlin NL; Parker R; Fairley CK; Gunn JM; Hocking J
BMC Infect Dis; 2008 May; 8():62. PubMed ID: 18471280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outreach health adviser in a community clinic screening programme improves management of genital chlamydia infection.
Jones K; Webb A; Mallinson H; Birley H
Sex Transm Infect; 2002 Apr; 78(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 12081168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. General practice intervention to increase opportunistic screening for chlamydia.
Merritt TD; Durrheim DN; Hope K; Byron P
Sex Health; 2007 Dec; 4(4):249-51. PubMed ID: 18082068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The relative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three contrasting approaches to partner notification for curable sexually transmitted infections: a cluster randomised trial in primary care.
Cassell JA; Dodds J; Estcourt C; Llewellyn C; Lanza S; Richens J; Smith H; Symonds M; Copas A; Roberts T; Walters K; White P; Lowndes C; Mistry H; Rossello-Roig M; Smith H; Rait G
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(5):1-115, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 25619445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
