These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15240049)

  • 1. Segmentation and the pairing hypothesis.
    Bragason O
    Behav Processes; 2004 Sep; 67(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15240049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of terminal-link stimuli in concurrent-chain schedules: revisited using a behavioral-history procedure.
    Ono K; Yamagishi N; Aotsuka T; Hojo R; Nogawa Y
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15967283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychological distance to reward: equating the number of stimulus and response segments.
    Doughty AH; Meginley ME; Doughty SS; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2004 May; 66(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 15110910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of signaling reinforcement on resistance to change in a multiple schedule.
    Bell MC; Seip KM; Fitzsimmons KS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jan; 74(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 17071019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Varying initial-link and terminal-link durations in concurrent-chains schedules: a comparison of three models.
    Mazur JE
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 15157972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of unsignaled delays between stimuli in a chain schedule on responding and resistance to change.
    Bell MC; Gomez BE
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 17933472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules when time to reinforcement is held constant.
    Bell MC; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Mar; 99(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 23319434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of unpredictable changes in initial-link duration on choice and timing.
    Kyonka EG; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 19429216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signals, resistance to change, and conditioned reinforcement in a multiple schedule.
    Bell MC; Gomez BE; Kessler K
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 18355988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the terminal-link effect depend on duration or reinforcement rate?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 15182927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response allocation in a rapid-acquisition concurrent-chains procedure: effects of overall terminal-link duration.
    Christensen DR; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 19429217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditioned reinforcement versus time to reinforcement in chain schedules.
    Williams BA; Royalty P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 2341821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring a concurrent-chains paradox: decreasing preference as an initial link is shortened.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jan; 31(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 15656723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.
    Preston RA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):155-75. PubMed ID: 2037825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elicited responding in chain schedules.
    Dougherty DM; Lewis P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):475-87. PubMed ID: 1774540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of intertrial interval food on extinction and devaluation in chain schedules.
    Bell MC; Goldenberg M; McDevitt MA
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):133-51. PubMed ID: 17503691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choices between segmented and unsegmented schedules and the self-control paradigm.
    Alessandri J; Lattal KA; Fantino E
    Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():26-31. PubMed ID: 23206903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of primary reinforcement on pigeons' initial-link responding under a concurrent chains schedule with nondifferntial terminal links.
    Ploog BO
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 11516116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential resurgence and response elimination.
    Doughty AH; da Silva SP; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 17395402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.