These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. "Turning back the clock" on serial-stimulus sign tracking. Allan RW; Matthews TJ J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):427-43. PubMed ID: 1774537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Response-cost punishment via token loss with pigeons. Pietras CJ; Hackenberg TD Behav Processes; 2005 Jun; 69(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 15896532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of initial-link duration on preference and resistance to change in concurrent-chains schedules. Jimenez-Gomez C; Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 19429215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Observing of chain-schedule stimuli. Slezak JM; Anderson KG Behav Processes; 2014 Jun; 105():19-27. PubMed ID: 24582929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components. Grace RC; Nevin JA J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Sep; 74(2):165-88. PubMed ID: 11029021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. When to respond? And how much? Temporal control and response output on mixed-fixed-interval schedules with unequally probable components. Whitaker S; Lowe CF; Wearden JH Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 17628349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A quantitative analysis of sensitivity to the conditioned reinforcing value of terminal-link stimuli in a concurrent-chains schedule. Omino T J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Nov; 60(3):587-94. PubMed ID: 8283150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of required rates of responding upon choice. Fantino E J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Jan; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 5636850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Acquisition of preference in concurrent chains: comparing linear-operator and memory-representational models. Grace RC J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Jul; 28(3):257-76. PubMed ID: 12136702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of US identity on elimination and recovery of autoshaped responding with explicitly unpaired and degraded contingency extinction procedures. Colwill RM Behav Processes; 2007 Jan; 74(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17045760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. Killeen P J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 5660707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preference for a segmented schedule using a brief S+ stimulus correlated with a great delay reduction in humans. Alessandri J; Molet M; Fantino E Behav Processes; 2010 Sep; 85(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 20558259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement? Grace RC; Bragason O J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Mar; 83(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15828593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of delayed conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules. Royalty P; Williams BA; Fantino E J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jan; 47(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 3559458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects. Dunn R; Spetch ML J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 2324663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Initial-link duration and acquisition of preference in concurrent chains. Berg ME; Grace RC Learn Behav; 2006 Feb; 34(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 16786884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability. McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES Learn Behav; 2003 Aug; 31(3):225-41. PubMed ID: 14577547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]