These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1524028)

  • 1. Characteristics of face seal leakage in filtering facepieces.
    Chen CC; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Sep; 53(9):533-9. PubMed ID: 1524028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aerosol penetration through filtering facepieces and respirator cartridges.
    Chen CC; Lehtimäki M; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Sep; 53(9):566-74. PubMed ID: 1524031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nanoparticle penetration through filter media and leakage through face seal interface of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):568-80. PubMed ID: 22294504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: I. Experimental.
    Hinds WC; Kraske G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):836-41. PubMed ID: 3687728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting the location and shape of face seal leak sites on half-mask respirators.
    Oestenstad RK; Bartolucci AA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jun; 7(6):332-41. PubMed ID: 20379896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Filter and leak penetration characteristics of a dust and mist filtering facepiece.
    Chen CC; Ruuskanen J; Pilacinski W; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Dec; 51(12):632-9. PubMed ID: 2270830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fit test for filtering facepieces: search for a low-cost, quantitative method.
    Myojo T; Willeke K; Chen CC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1994 Sep; 55(9):797-805. PubMed ID: 7942513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: II. Predictive model.
    Hinds WC; Bellin P
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):842-7. PubMed ID: 3318364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total inward leakage of nanoparticles through filtering facepiece respirators.
    Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Apr; 55(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 21292731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory and field evaluation of a new personal sampling system for assessing the protection provided by the N95 filtering facepiece respirators against particles.
    Lee SA; Grinshpun SA; Adhikari A; Li W; McKay R; Maynard A; Reponen T
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Apr; 49(3):245-57. PubMed ID: 15668259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loading and filtration characteristics of filtering facepieces.
    Chen CC; Lehtimäki M; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Feb; 54(2):51-60. PubMed ID: 8452097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Particle size-dependent leakage and losses of aerosols in respirators.
    Holton PM; Tackett DL; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 3687729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. N95-companion measurement of cout/cin ratios for two n95 filtering facepiece respirators and one surgical mask.
    Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(10):527-32. PubMed ID: 23984654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the performance of the N95-companion: effects of filter penetration and comparison with other aerosol instruments.
    Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(7):417-26. PubMed ID: 22642759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Penetration of airborne microorganisms through a surgical mask and a dust/mist respirator.
    Willeke K; Qian Y; Donnelly J; Grinshpun S; Ulevicius V
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Apr; 57(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 8901236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of controlled negative pressure and aerosol quantitative respirator fit test systems by using human subjects.
    Crutchfield CD; Murphy RW; Van Ert MD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Jan; 54(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 8470618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a tractor cab using real-time aerosol counting instrumentation.
    Hall RM; Heitbrink WA; Reed LD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Jan; 17(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11800406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of leak location on measured respirator fit.
    Crutchfield CD; Park DL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Jun; 58(6):413-7. PubMed ID: 9183835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in penetration of submicrometric particles through electrostatic filtering facepieces during exposure to paraffin oil aerosol.
    Plebani C; Listrani S; Tranfo G; Tombolini F
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(9):556-61. PubMed ID: 22862434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.