228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15241230)
1. The RetroX auditory implant for high-frequency hearing loss.
Garin P; Genard F; Galle C; Jamart J
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Jul; 25(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 15241230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rehabilitation of high-frequency hearing loss with the RetroX auditory implant.
Garin P; Genard F; Galle C; Fameree MH; Jamart J; Gersdorff M
B-ENT; 2005; 1(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15999671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital hearing aids for high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss: preliminary experience with the RetroX device.
Barbara M; Bandiera G; Serra B; Marrone V; Tarentini S; Pinna JC; Ronchetti F; Graziadio M; Monini S
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):693-6. PubMed ID: 16012028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between new and old generation RetroX auditory implants.
Van Damme JP; Jamart J; Garin P
B-ENT; 2010; 6(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20420073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rehabilitation for high-frequency sensorineural hearing impairment in adults with the symphonix vibrant soundbridge: a comparative study.
Uziel A; Mondain M; Hagen P; Dejean F; Doucet G
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):775-83. PubMed ID: 14501456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binaurality in middle ear implant recipients using contralateral digital hearing AIDS.
Saliba I; Calmels MN; Wanna G; Iversenc G; James C; Deguine O; Fraysse B
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Jul; 26(4):680-5. PubMed ID: 16015168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device: results of the phase II SOUNDTEC direct system clinical trial.
Hough JV; Matthews P; Wood MW; Dyer RK
Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 12438853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
Smoorenburg GF
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory Performance and Subjective Satisfaction with the ADHEAR System.
Almuhawas F; Alzhrani F; Saleh S; Alsanosi A; Yousef M
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 32544908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient selection for incus body coupling of a totally implantable middle ear implant.
Zenner HP; Baumann JW; Reischl G; Plinkert P; Zimmermann R; Mauz PS; Limberger A; Maassen MM
Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Aug; 123(6):683-96. PubMed ID: 12953766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term functional outcome and satisfaction of patients with an active middle ear implant for sensorineural hearing loss compared to a matched population with conventional hearing aids.
Ihler F; Bewarder J; Blum J; Matthias C; Canis M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 271(12):3161-9. PubMed ID: 24248731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coupling the Vibrant Soundbridge to cochlea round window: auditory results in patients with mixed hearing loss.
Beltrame AM; Martini A; Prosser S; Giarbini N; Streitberger C
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 19180678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
