121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15241614)
1. A comparison of three histological grading systems in endometrial cancer.
Bilgin T; Ozuysal S; Ozan H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 272(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 15241614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of age on long-term outcome in patients with endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation.
Jolly S; Vargas CE; Kumar T; Weiner SA; Brabbins DS; Chen PY; Floyd W; Martinez AA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Oct; 103(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 16545441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The reproducibility of histological parameters employed in the novel binary grading systems of endometrial cancer.
Gemer O; Uriev L; Voldarsky M; Gdalevich M; Ben-Dor D; Barak F; Anteby EY; Lavie O
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 18775628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The prognostic value of semiquantitative nuclear grading in endometrial carcinomas.
Hachisuga T; Kawarabayashi T; Iwasaka T; Sugimori H; Kamura T; Tsuneyoshi M
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Apr; 65(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 9103400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Leitao MM; Kehoe S; Barakat RR; Alektiar K; Gattoc LP; Rabbitt C; Chi DS; Soslow RA; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 19167049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endometrial sampling diagnosis of FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma with a background of complex atypical hyperplasia and final hysterectomy pathology.
Leitao MM; Kehoe S; Barakat RR; Alektiar K; Rabbitt C; Chi DS; Soslow RA; Abu-Rustum NR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 202(3):278.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20022581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reproducibility of a binary tumor grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, compared with FIGO system and nuclear grading.
Sagae S; Saito T; Satoh M; Ikeda T; Kimura S; Mori M; Sato N; Kudo R
Oncology; 2004; 67(5-6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15713989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The utility of the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics histologic grading of endometrial adenocarcinoma using a defined nuclear grading system. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Zaino RJ; Kurman RJ; Diana KL; Morrow CP
Cancer; 1995 Jan; 75(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 7804981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling diagnosis of FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Leitao MM; Kehoe S; Barakat RR; Alektiar K; Gattoc LP; Rabbitt C; Chi DS; Soslow RA; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 18752842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Morphologic studies of endometrial cancer for biological assessment of nuclear grading].
Köhler U
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1991; 113(18):995-1003. PubMed ID: 1750299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of D&C and hysterectomy pathologic findings in endometrial cancer patients.
Wang X; Huang Z; Di W; Lin Q
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jul; 272(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 15666177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Preoperative platelet count as index of the grading in endometrial carcinoma].
Giannella L; Menozzi G; Di Monte I; Venturini P; De Pace V; Boselli F; Ternelli G; Jasonni VM
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Aug; 60(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 18560341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: clinical implications of cervical stromal invasion.
Orezzoli JP; Sioletic S; Olawaiye A; Oliva E; del Carmen MG
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 19345400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical stage, final grade, and survival of women with endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy shows well-differentiated tumors.
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki J; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Nov; 99(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 16005945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the histologic grading for ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: a retrospective multi-institutional study by the Japan Clear Cell Carcinoma Study Group.
Yamamoto S; Kasajima A; Takano M; Yaegashi N; Fujiwara H; Kuzuya K; Kigawa J; Tsuda H; Kurachi H; Kikuchi Y; Sugiyama T; Tsuda H; Moriya T
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Mar; 30(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 21293288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adenomyosis is associated with myometrial invasion by FIGO 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Ismiil ND; Rasty G; Ghorab Z; Nofech-Mozes S; Bernardini M; Thomas G; Ackerman I; Covens A; Khalifa MA
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2007 Jul; 26(3):278-83. PubMed ID: 17581412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Pelvic lymphadenectomy as an alternative to adjuvant radiotherapy in early stage endometrial cancer at high risk of recurrent lymphatic metastases (stage I)].
Amato NA; Partipilo V; Mele F; Boscia F; De Marzo P
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Feb; 61(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 19204656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis.
Lax SF; Kurman RJ; Pizer ES; Wu L; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Sep; 24(9):1201-8. PubMed ID: 10976693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The prognostic value of nuclear grading and the revised FIGO grading of endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Ayhan A; Taskiran C; Yuce K; Kucukali T
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2003 Jan; 22(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 12496701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
