These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1524162)

  • 1. [Endotracheal suctioning using a 24-hour continuous system. Can costs and waste products be reduced?].
    Zielmann S; Grote R; Sydow M; Radke J; Burchardi H
    Anaesthesist; 1992 Aug; 41(8):494-8. PubMed ID: 1524162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physiologic impact of closed-system endotracheal suctioning in spontaneously breathing patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
    Seymour CW; Cross BJ; Cooke CR; Gallop RL; Fuchs BD
    Respir Care; 2009 Mar; 54(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 19245731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of a closed (Trach Care MAC) with an open endotracheal suction system in small premature infants.
    Cordero L; Sananes M; Ayers LW
    J Perinatol; 2000; 20(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 10802838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of two airway suctioning frequencies in mechanically ventilated, very-low-birthweight infants.
    Cordero L; Sananes M; Ayers LW
    Respir Care; 2001 Aug; 46(8):783-8. PubMed ID: 11463368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence of colonization, nosocomial pneumonia, and mortality in critically ill patients using a Trach Care closed-suction system versus an open-suction system: prospective, randomized study.
    Deppe SA; Kelly JW; Thoi LL; Chudy JH; Longfield RN; Ducey JP; Truwit CL; Antopol MR
    Crit Care Med; 1990 Dec; 18(12):1389-93. PubMed ID: 2245613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Open and closed endotracheal suction systems in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients: a meta-analysis.
    Jongerden IP; Rovers MM; Grypdonck MH; Bonten MJ
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):260-70. PubMed ID: 17133187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Does directed bronchoscopic bronchial cleansing have an advantage over conventional suctioning? A prospective study of hemodynamics, gas exchange and suction-induced mucosal lesions in long-term ventilated patients].
    Konrad F; Wiedeck H; Deller A; Diatzko J; Schmitz JE
    Anaesthesist; 1988 Jul; 37(7):413-9. PubMed ID: 3414953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Closed versus open suctioning techniques.
    Maggiore SM; Iacobone E; Zito G; Conti C; Antonelli M; Proietti R
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2002 May; 68(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 12029246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative effectiveness of standard endotracheal tubes vs. endotracheal tubes with continuous subglottic suctioning on ventilator-associated pneumonia rates.
    Speroni KG; Lucas J; Dugan L; O'Meara-Lett M; Putman M; Daniel M; Atherton M
    Nurs Econ; 2011; 29(1):15-20, 37. PubMed ID: 21469484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Closed suctioning system: critical analysis for its use.
    Harada N
    Jpn J Nurs Sci; 2010 Jun; 7(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 20618673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physiological responses to endotracheal and oral suctioning in paediatric patients: the influence of endotracheal tube sizes and suction pressures.
    Singh NC; Kissoon N; Frewen T; Tiffin N
    Clin Intensive Care; 1991; 2(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 10149098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Closed versus open endotracheal suctioning: costs and physiologic consequences.
    Johnson KL; Kearney PA; Johnson SB; Niblett JB; MacMillan NL; McClain RE
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Apr; 22(4):658-66. PubMed ID: 8143475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comprehensive review of pediatric endotracheal suctioning: Effects, indications, and clinical practice.
    Morrow BM; Argent AC
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2008 Sep; 9(5):465-77. PubMed ID: 18679146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
    Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of closed endotracheal suctioning systems on mechanical ventilator performance.
    El Masry A; Williams PF; Chipman DW; Kratohvil JP; Kacmarek RM
    Respir Care; 2005 Mar; 50(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 15737244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the effect of closed versus open endotracheal suction systems on the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
    Topeli A; Harmanci A; Cetinkaya Y; Akdeniz S; Unal S
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Sep; 58(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 15350708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oropharyngeal secretion volume in intubated patients: the importance of oral suctioning.
    Sole ML; Penoyer DA; Bennett M; Bertrand J; Talbert S
    Am J Crit Care; 2011 Nov; 20(6):e141-5. PubMed ID: 22045150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endotracheal suctioning with or without instillation of isotonic sodium chloride solution in critically ill children.
    Ridling DA; Martin LD; Bratton SL
    Am J Crit Care; 2003 May; 12(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 12751395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endotracheal tube narrowing after closed-system suctioning: prevalence and risk factors.
    Glass C; Grap MJ; Sessler CN
    Am J Crit Care; 1999 Mar; 8(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 10071699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multisite survey of suctioning techniques and airway management practices.
    Sole ML; Byers JF; Ludy JE; Zhang Y; Banta CM; Brummel K
    Am J Crit Care; 2003 May; 12(3):220-30; quiz 231-2. PubMed ID: 12751396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.