105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1524173)
1. Accuracy of the BoMED NCCOM3 bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during induced hypotension: an experimental study in dogs.
Tibballs J; Hochmann M; Osborne A; Carter B
Anaesth Intensive Care; 1992 Aug; 20(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 1524173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery.
Thomas AN; Ryan J; Doran BR; Pollard BJ
Intensive Care Med; 1991; 17(7):383-6. PubMed ID: 1774390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.
Spiering W; van Es PN; de Leeuw PW
Heart; 1998 May; 79(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 9659188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving agreement between thoracic bioimpedance and dye dilution cardiac output estimation in children.
O'Connell AJ; Tibballs J; Coulthard M
Anaesth Intensive Care; 1991 Aug; 19(3):434-40. PubMed ID: 1767916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac output measurement during exercise in COPD: A comparison of dye dilution and impedance cardiography.
Louvaris Z; Spetsioti S; Andrianopoulos V; Chynkiamis N; Habazettl H; Wagner H; Zakynthinos S; Wagner PD; Vogiatzis I
Clin Respir J; 2019 Apr; 13(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 30724023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A computer-assisted noninvasive monitoring system with graphic display of online determination of cardiovascular parameters].
Castor G; Motsch J; Altmayer P; Molter G
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1989 Nov; 34(11):262-7. PubMed ID: 2605290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients.
Sageman WS; Amundson DE
Crit Care Med; 1993 Aug; 21(8):1139-42. PubMed ID: 8339577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of impedance cardiography: comparison of NCCOM3-R7 with Fick and thermodilution methods.
Yakimets J; Jensen L
Heart Lung; 1995; 24(3):194-206. PubMed ID: 7622393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: comparison of electrical bioimpedance and carbon dioxide rebreathing techniques.
Smith SA; Russell AE; West MJ; Chalmers J
Br Heart J; 1988 Mar; 59(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 3128316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac output determinations in the pig--thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Jivegård L; Frid I; Haljamäe H; Holm J; Holm S; Wickström I
Crit Care Med; 1990 Sep; 18(9):995-8. PubMed ID: 2394124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lack of agreement between bioimpedance and continuous thermodilution measurement of cardiac output in intensive care unit patients.
Barry BN; Mallick A; Bodenham AR; Vucevic M
Crit Care; 1997; 1(2):71-74. PubMed ID: 11056698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cardiac output monitoring by impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery].
Shimizu H; Seki S; Mizuguchi A; Tsuchida H; Watanabe H; Namiki A
Masui; 1990 Apr; 39(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 2362347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trending of impedance-monitored cardiac variables: method and statistical power analysis of 100 control studies in a pediatric intensive care unit.
Mickell JJ; Lucking SE; Chaten FC; Young ES
Crit Care Med; 1990 Jun; 18(6):645-50. PubMed ID: 2344756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of cardiac output in neonates supported by mechanical ventilation: measurement with thoracic electrical bioimpedance and pulsed Doppler ultrasound.
Tibballs J
J Pediatr; 1989 Apr; 114(4 Pt 1):632-5. PubMed ID: 2926576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of cardiac output derived from FloTrac™/Vigileo™ and impedance cardiography during major abdominal surgery.
Kim JY; Kim BR; Lee KH; Kim KW; Kim JH; Lee SI; Kim KT; Choe WJ; Park JS; Kim JW
J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1342-9. PubMed ID: 23803309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of thermodilution, lithium dilution, and pulse contour analysis for the measurement of cardiac output in 3 different hemodynamic states in dogs.
Morgaz J; Granados Mdel M; Muñoz-Rascón P; Dominguez JM; Fernández-Sarmiento JA; Gómez-Villamandos RJ; Navarrete R
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2014; 24(5):562-70. PubMed ID: 25142925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a non-invasive measure of cardiac output for porcine research.
Broomhead CJ; Wright SJ; Kiff KM; Withington PS
Lab Anim; 1998 Jul; 32(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 9718481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of haematocrit on transthoracic electrical impedance and on the calculation of cardiac output by an impedance cardiograph.
Thomas A; Vohra A; Pollard B
Intensive Care Med; 1991; 17(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 2071766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients.
Gotshall RW; Wood VC; Miles DS
Crit Care Med; 1989 Aug; 17(8):806-11. PubMed ID: 2752776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
