105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1524173)
21. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique.
Maass SW; Roekaerts PM; Lancé MD
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 24746334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Clancy TV; Norman K; Reynolds R; Covington D; Maxwell JG
J Trauma; 1991 Aug; 31(8):1116-20; discussion 1120-1. PubMed ID: 1875438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of thoracic bioimpedance with acetylene uptake for measuring cardiac output.
Wang E; Cruz C; Pettersen MR; Hoff J; Helgerud J
Int J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 35(11):925-32. PubMed ID: 24886928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs.
Critchley LA; Peng ZY; Fok BS; Lee A; Phillips RA
Anesth Analg; 2005 Mar; 100(3):748-753. PubMed ID: 15728064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Application of impedance cardiography during exercise.
Miles DS; Cox MH; Verde TJ; Gotshall RW
Biol Psychol; 1993 Aug; 36(1-2):119-29. PubMed ID: 8218618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].
Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance and bioreactance methods at rest and during exercise.
Jakovljevic DG; Moore S; Hallsworth K; Fattakhova G; Thoma C; Trenell MI
J Clin Monit Comput; 2012 Apr; 26(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 22234400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Continuous noninvasive estimation of cardiac output by electrical bioimpedance: an experimental study in dogs.
Tremper KK; Hufstedler SM; Barker SJ; Zaccari J; Harris D; Anderson S; Roohk V
Crit Care Med; 1986 Mar; 14(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 3943340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Poor accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using bioimpedance cardiography [PhysioFlow(R)] compared to magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients.
Taylor K; Manlhiot C; McCrindle B; Grosse-Wortmann L; Holtby H
Anesth Analg; 2012 Apr; 114(4):771-5. PubMed ID: 22314693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output.
Gotshall RW; Wood VC; Miles DS
Ann Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(5):495-505. PubMed ID: 2610421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
Engoren M; Barbee D
Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation.
Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Bishop MH; Appel PL; Van de Water JM; Harrington GR; Wang X; Patil RS
Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1907-12. PubMed ID: 7988125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of cardiac output measurement in dogs by transpulmonary pulse contour analysis.
Shih A; Maisenbacher HW; Bandt C; Ricco C; Bailey J; Rivera J; Estrada A
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2011 Aug; 21(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 21827589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical monitoring of cardiac output assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography in anaesthetised dogs: a comparison with the thermodilution technique.
Mantovani MM; Fantoni DT; Gimenes AM; de Castro JR; Flor PB; Ida KK; Schwartz DS
BMC Vet Res; 2017 Nov; 13(1):325. PubMed ID: 29121915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of continuous arterial pressure waveform analysis with the lithium dilution technique to monitor cardiac output in conscious dogs with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
Duffy AL; Butler AL; Radecki SV; Campbell VL
Am J Vet Res; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1365-73. PubMed ID: 19878019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. AANA Journal course: new technologies in anesthesia: update for nurse anesthetists--noninvasive, continuous, cardiac output monitoring by thoracic electrical bioimpedance. 16.
Atkins CS
AANA J; 1991 Oct; 59(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 1957569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of a minimally invasive non-calibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitor (FloTrac/Vigileo) in anaesthetized dogs.
Bektas RN; Kutter AP; Hartnack S; Jud RS; Schnyder M; Matos JM; Bettschart-Wolfensberger R
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2012 Sep; 39(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 22726234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Abdominal surgery alters the calibration of bioimpedance cardiac output measurement.
Critchley LA; Leung DH; Short TG
Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1996 Feb; 13(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 8738594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cardiac output measurement using an ultrasound dilution method: a validation study in ventilated piglets.
de Boode WP; van Heijst AF; Hopman JC; Tanke RB; van der Hoeven HG; Liem KD
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2010 Jan; 11(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 19593242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
