411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15241909)
21. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
Donly KJ; Segura A
Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 4-year clinical performance and survival analysis of Class I and II compomer restorations in permanent teeth.
Huth KC; Manhart J; Selbertinger A; Paschos E; Kaaden C; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15241910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.
Malament KA; Socransky SS
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
J Adhes Dent; 2007 Oct; 9(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 18297828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
Markovic D; Peric T
Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ
Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fiber-reinforced packable resin composites in Class II cavities.
van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
J Dent; 2006 Nov; 34(10):763-9. PubMed ID: 16580114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
Mjör IA
Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study.
Hasselrot L
Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 9646387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
