These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15241909)

  • 41. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
    Brackett WW; Gilpatrick RO; Browning WD; Gregory PN
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10337292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in Class I cavities: 3-year results.
    Demirci M; Uysal O
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):376-81. PubMed ID: 17212081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
    Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation.
    de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study.
    Zimmer S; Göhlich O; Rüttermann S; Lang H; Raab WH; Barthel CR
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):484-7. PubMed ID: 18833853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of wear and clinical performance between amalgam, composite and open sandwich restorations: 2-year results.
    Sachdeo A; Gray GB; Sulieman MA; Jagger DC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 15058177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Glass ionomer cement and "sandwich" restorations after two years of clinical service].
    Reich E
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Feb; 46(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 1814714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
    Atieh M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.
    Scholtanus JD; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16973253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A
    Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S; van Noort R
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The in vitro effect of glass-ionomer cement restoration on enamel subjected to a demineralization and remineralization model.
    Serra MC; Cury JA
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Feb; 23(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 1641453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical performance and SEM evaluation of direct composite restorations in primary molars.
    Puppin-Rontani RM; de Góes MF; Voelske CE; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 17073199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition.
    Wendt LK; Koch G; Birkhed D
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):149-55. PubMed ID: 9850557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice.
    Roberts JF; Attari N; Sherriff M
    Br Dent J; 2005 Apr; 198(7):427-31. PubMed ID: 15870802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions.
    Abdalla AI; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 17073206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 19237189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.