These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15243008)
1. Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers. Van Montfoort AP; Dumoulin JC; Kester AD; Evers JL Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):2103-8. PubMed ID: 15243008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Late stages of embryo progression are a much better predictor of clinical pregnancy than early cleavage in intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization cycles with blastocyst-stage transfer. Rehman KS; Bukulmez O; Langley M; Carr BR; Nackley AC; Doody KM; Doody KJ Fertil Steril; 2007 May; 87(5):1041-52. PubMed ID: 17336973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Guerif F; Lemseffer M; Bidault R; Gasnier O; Saussereau MH; Cadoret V; Jamet C; Royere D Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1051-8. PubMed ID: 19218575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human blastocyst morphological quality is significantly improved in embryos classified as fast on day 3 (>or=10 cells), bringing into question current embryological dogma. Luna M; Copperman AB; Duke M; Ezcurra D; Sandler B; Barritt J Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 17531231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of pronuclear zygote morphology and early cleavage status of zygotes as additional criteria in the selection of day 3 embryos: a randomized study. Chen C; Kattera S Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 16595210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treating women under 36 years old without top-quality embryos on day 2: a prospective study comparing double embryo transfer with single blastocyst transfer. Guerif F; Frapsauce C; Chavez C; Cadoret V; Royere D Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 21310748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Embryo fragmentation as a determinant of blastocyst development in vitro and pregnancy outcomes following embryo transfer. Stone BA; Greene J; Vargyas JM; Ringler GE; Marrs RP Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):2014-9; discussion 2019-20. PubMed ID: 15970880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of pregnancy rates after the transfer of early dividing embryos versus slower dividing embryos. Windt ML; Kruger TF; Coetzee K; Lombard CJ Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1155-62. PubMed ID: 15044410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Embryo transfer is equally effective at cleavage stage and blastocyst stage: a randomized prospective study. Hreinsson J; Rosenlund B; Fridström M; Ek I; Levkov L; Sjöblom P; Hovatta O Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 15541857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Barrenetxea G; López de Larruzea A; Ganzabal T; Jiménez R; Carbonero K; Mandiola M Fertil Steril; 2005 Jan; 83(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15652886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Zygote transfer on day 1 versus cleavage stage embryo transfer on day 3: a prospective randomized trial. Jaroudi K; Al-Hassan S; Sieck U; Al-Sufyan H; Al-Kabra M; Coskun S Hum Reprod; 2004 Mar; 19(3):645-8. PubMed ID: 14998964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Establishment of criteria for elective single embryo transfer at day 2 or day 3 by analyzing cases with successful implantation of all embryos transferred. Shibahara H; Hirano Y; Okajima T; Shimada K; Kikuchi K; Suzuki T; Takamizawa S; Suzuki M J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Aug; 33(4):501-5. PubMed ID: 17688618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study. Papanikolaou EG; D'haeseleer E; Verheyen G; Van de Velde H; Camus M; Van Steirteghem A; Devroey P; Tournaye H Hum Reprod; 2005 Nov; 20(11):3198-203. PubMed ID: 16055454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Research on the selection of embryos for transfer using a combined grading for embryo growth rate and morphology and zygote pronuclear morphology]. Liao HQ; Lin G; Lu CF; Gong F; Xiao HM; Lu GX Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 May; 41(5):319-21. PubMed ID: 16762187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Embryo selection or uterine environment: which plays the greater role in blastocyst transfer cycles? Kovacs P; Matyas S; Kaali SG J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 May; 37(5):416-21. PubMed ID: 21114577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing the number of cleavage stage embryos to transfer on day 3 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study. Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Surrey ES; Racowsky C; Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 18321489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blastocyst stage transfer: the real benefits compared with early embryo transfer. Plachot M; Belaisch-Allart J; Mayenga JM; Chouraqui A; Serkine AM; Tesquier L Hum Reprod; 2000 Dec; 15 Suppl 6():24-30. PubMed ID: 11261480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples. Van Peperstraten AM; Kreuwel IA; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; Van Dop PA; Grol RP; Kremer JA Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 18231893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of vitrification and slow-freezing of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development and pregnancy outcomes]. Li Y; Chen ZJ; Yang HJ; Zhong WX; Ma SY; Li M Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 42(11):753-5. PubMed ID: 18307902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blastocyst embryo transfer is the primary determinant for improved outcomes in oocyte donation cycles. Porat N; Boehnlein LM; Barker MA; Kovacs P; Lindheim SR J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Apr; 36(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 20492388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]