These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15243175)

  • 1. Pre-equating: a simulation study based on a large scale assessment model.
    Taherbhai HM; Young MJ
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 15243175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.
    Smith RM; Gross LJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 9661719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.
    Taherbhai HM; Seo DY
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17215567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
    Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing an initial physical function item bank from existing sources.
    Bode RK; Cella D; Lai JS; Heinemann AW
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):124-36. PubMed ID: 12748405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the lack of comonotonicity between likert scores and Rasch-based measures.
    Bertoli-Barsotti L
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 15701945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based practice for equating health status items: sample size and IRT model.
    Cook KF; Taylor PW; Dodd BG; Teal CR; McHorney CA
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 17440260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scaling the sickness impact profile using item response theory: an exploration of linearity, adaptive use, and patient driven item weights.
    Lindeboom R; Holman R; Dijkgraaf MG; Sprangers MA; Buskens E; Diederiks JP; De Haan RJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 57(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 15019012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An application of Rasch analysis to the measurement of communicative functioning.
    Doyle PJ; Hula WD; McNeil MR; Mikolic JM; Matthews C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 48(6):1412-28. PubMed ID: 16478380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Academic Medical Center Linear Disability Score (ALDS) item bank: item response theory analysis in a mixed patient population.
    Holman R; Weisscher N; Glas CA; Dijkgraaf MG; Vermeulen M; de Haan RJ; Lindeboom R
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 Dec; 3():83. PubMed ID: 16381611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis.
    Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4732-41. PubMed ID: 17065481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rasch modeling of revised token test performance: validity and sensitivity to change.
    Hula W; Doyle PJ; McNeil MR; Mikolic JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 49(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 16533071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Equating designs and procedures used in Rasch scaling.
    Skaggs G; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):182-95. PubMed ID: 20693702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expanding an existing multiple choice test with a mixed format test: simulation study on sample size and item recovery in concurrent calibration.
    Paek I; Young MJ
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(4):394-406. PubMed ID: 17068379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of life in infants and children with atopic dermatitis: addressing issues of differential item functioning across countries in multinational clinical trials.
    McKenna SP; Doward LC; Meads DM; Tennant A; Lawton G; Grueger J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Jul; 5():45. PubMed ID: 17662129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnitude estimation and categorical rating scaling in social sciences: a theoretical and psychometric controversy.
    Beltyukova SA; Stone GE; Fox CM
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 18480511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.