These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15243729)

  • 1. Visual illusion in virtual world alters women's target-directed walking.
    Chaudhury S; Eisinger JM; Hao L; Hicks J; Chivukula R; Turano KA
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 159(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 15243729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manipulating perception versus action in recalibration tasks.
    Ziemer CJ; Branson MJ; Chihak BJ; Kearney JK; Cremer JF; Plumert JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1260-74. PubMed ID: 23715972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Similar effects of a motion-in-depth illusion on manual tracking and perceptual judgements.
    López-Moliner J; Smeets JB; Brenner E
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Aug; 151(4):553-6. PubMed ID: 12851807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.
    Smeets JB; Brenner E; de Grave DD; Cuijpers RH
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 12410328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: a mere illusion of dissociation.
    Dassonville P; Bala JK
    PLoS Biol; 2004 Nov; 2(11):e364. PubMed ID: 15510224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery.
    Glover S; Dixon P; Castiello U; Rushworth MF
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 166(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16082537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociations between vision for perception and vision for action depend on the relative availability of egocentric and allocentric information.
    Cañal-Bruland R; Voorwald F; Wielaard K; van der Kamp J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1206-14. PubMed ID: 23670269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The induced Roelofs effect: two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame?
    Dassonville P; Bridgeman B; Kaur Bala J; Thiem P; Sampanes A
    Vision Res; 2004 Mar; 44(6):603-11. PubMed ID: 14693187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vision for spatial perception and vision for action: a dissociation between the left-right and near-far dimensions.
    Coello Y; Richaud S; Magne P; Rossetti Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(5):622-33. PubMed ID: 12559155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual object localisation in space. Interaction of retinal, eye position, vestibular and neck proprioceptive information.
    Mergner T; Nasios G; Maurer C; Becker W
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 11685409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. More than just perception-action recalibration: walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space.
    Kelly JW; Donaldson LS; Sjolund LA; Freiberg JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1473-85. PubMed ID: 23839015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space.
    Bernardis P; Knox P; Bruno N
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 15791463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.
    Haffenden AM; Goodale MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jan; 10(1):122-36. PubMed ID: 9526087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How preparation to touch or grasp alters visual size perception.
    Vishton PM; Jones ED; Stevens JA
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():431-5. PubMed ID: 26245648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of visual and nonvisual sensory inputs to walked distance in a blind-walking task.
    Ellard CG; Shaughnessy SC
    Perception; 2003; 32(5):567-78. PubMed ID: 12854643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping?. Two- and three-dimensional targets.
    Kwok RM; Braddick OJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(8):932-40. PubMed ID: 12667529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Keeping a target in memory does not increase the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades.
    de Brouwer AJ; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):977-83. PubMed ID: 26686530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?
    Glazebrook CM; Dhillon VP; Keetch KM; Lyons J; Amazeen E; Weeks DJ; Elliott D
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 15300347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time.
    Dyde RT; Milner AD
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 144(4):518-27. PubMed ID: 12037636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of roll visual motion on online control of arm movement: reaching within a dynamic virtual environment.
    Dvorkin AY; Kenyon RV; Keshner EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 193(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 18936925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.