These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15244027)

  • 1. The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss.
    Kiliç MA; Ogüt F
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15244027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
    Feng Y; Yin S; Kiefte M; Wang J
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stuart A; Phillips DP; Green WB
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 8588673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition threshold in noise: effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials.
    Van Tasell DJ; Yanz JL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 3669644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a noise reduction method--comparison between observed scores and scores predicted from STI.
    Ludvigsen C; Elberling C; Keidser G
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():50-5. PubMed ID: 8153564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech reception thresholds using conventional vs high-frequency spondees in normals and in subjects with marked high-frequency sensorineural loss.
    Martin FN; Jansen RM
    J Aud Res; 1985 Apr; 25(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 3842138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The quantitative effects of competition on verbal intelligibility in the elderly].
    Prosser S; Orzan E; Miani C
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1993; 13(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 8256616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of low-pass filtering on intelligibility of periodically interrupted speech.
    Bhargava P; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):EL87-92. PubMed ID: 22352622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of subtle mid-frequency auditory dysfunction upon speech discrimination in noise.
    Findlay RC; Denenberg LJ
    Audiology; 1977; 16(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 880129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
    Kain A; Amano-Kusumoto A; Hosom JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Saudi Arabic speech audiometry.
    Ashoor AA; Prochazka T
    Audiology; 1982; 21(6):493-508. PubMed ID: 7181742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.