These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15244325)

  • 1. Microbial indicators for differentiation of human- and pig-sourced fecal pollution.
    Chou CC; Lin YC; Su JJ
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2004; 39(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 15244325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of human-derived fecal pollution in environmental waters by use of a PCR-based human polyomavirus assay.
    McQuaig SM; Scott TM; Harwood VJ; Farrah SR; Lukasik JO
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 72(12):7567-74. PubMed ID: 16997988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antimicrobial resistance of fecal indicators in municipal wastewater treatment plant.
    Łuczkiewicz A; Jankowska K; Fudala-Książek S; Olańczuk-Neyman K
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(17):5089-97. PubMed ID: 20810144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Source tracking swine fecal waste in surface water proximal to swine concentrated animal feeding operations.
    Heaney CD; Myers K; Wing S; Hall D; Baron D; Stewart JR
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 511():676-83. PubMed ID: 25600418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the importance of faecal sources in human-impacted waters.
    Schoen ME; Soller JA; Ashbolt NJ
    Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(8):2670-80. PubMed ID: 21429551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of fecal contamination origin in reclaimed water open-air ponds using biochemical fingerprinting of enterococci and fecal coliforms.
    Casanovas-Massana A; Blanch AR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 May; 20(5):3003-10. PubMed ID: 23054766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of PFGE to source tracking of faecal pollution in coastal recreation area: a case study in Aoshima Beach, Japan.
    Furukawa T; Yoshida T; Suzuki Y
    J Appl Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 110(3):688-96. PubMed ID: 21244588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distribution of group D streptococci in rivers and streams.
    Ator LL; Starzyk MJ
    Microbios; 1976; 16(64):91-104. PubMed ID: 829267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diversity of Salmonella spp. and fungi in northern Greek rivers and their correlation to fecal pollution indicators.
    Arvanitidou M; Kanellou K; Vagiona DG
    Environ Res; 2005 Oct; 99(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 16194678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential of Enterococcus faecalis as a human fecal indicator for microbial source tracking.
    Wheeler AL; Hartel PG; Godfrey DG; Hill JL; Segars WI
    J Environ Qual; 2002; 31(4):1286-93. PubMed ID: 12175048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enterococci vs coliforms as a possible fecal contamination indicator: baseline data for Karachi.
    Hussain M; Rasool SA; Khan MT; Wajid A
    Pak J Pharm Sci; 2007 Apr; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17416563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bacterial pollution of the riverine surface microlayer and subsurface water.
    Skórczewski P; Mudryk Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 19587410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Presumptive fecal streptococci in environmental samples characterized by one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
    Niemi RM; Niemelä SI; Bamford DH; Hantula J; Hyvärinen T; Forsten T; Raateland A
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1993 Jul; 59(7):2190-6. PubMed ID: 8357252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fecal bacteria in the rivers of the Seine drainage network (France): sources, fate and modelling.
    Servais P; Garcia-Armisen T; George I; Billen G
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 375(1-3):152-67. PubMed ID: 17239424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ecology of "fecal indicator" bacteria commonly found in pulp and paper mill water systems.
    Gauthier F; Archibald F
    Water Res; 2001 Jun; 35(9):2207-18. PubMed ID: 11358300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches.
    Cloutier DD; McLellan SL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(4):. PubMed ID: 27940538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fecal coliform accumulation within a river subject to seasonally-disinfected wastewater discharges.
    Mitch AA; Gasner KC; Mitch WA
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4776-82. PubMed ID: 20580053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abundance of Enterococcus species, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, essential indicators of fecal pollution, in river water.
    Suzuki Y; Kanda N; Furukawa T
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2012; 47(11):1500-5. PubMed ID: 22702808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Status and trends of fecal indicator bacteria in two urban watersheds.
    Petersen TM; Suarez MP; Rifai HS; Jensen P; Su YC; Stein R
    Water Environ Res; 2006 Nov; 78(12):2340-55. PubMed ID: 17243234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid QPCR-based assay for fecal Bacteroides spp. as a tool for assessing fecal contamination in recreational waters.
    Converse RR; Blackwood AD; Kirs M; Griffith JF; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4828-37. PubMed ID: 19631958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.