BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15245709)

  • 1. How common are side effects of spinal manipulation and can these side effects be predicted?
    Cagnie B; Vinck E; Beernaert A; Cambier D
    Man Ther; 2004 Aug; 9(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 15245709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety of chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine: a prospective national survey.
    Thiel HW; Bolton JE; Docherty S; Portlock JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(21):2375-8; discussion 2379. PubMed ID: 17906581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors for immediate and global responses to chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine.
    Thiel HW; Bolton JE
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Mar; 31(3):172-83. PubMed ID: 18394493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Active range of motion in the cervical spine increases after spinal manipulation (toggle recoil).
    Whittingham W; Nilsson N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001; 24(9):552-5. PubMed ID: 11753327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pragmatic application of a clinical prediction rule in primary care to identify patients with low back pain with a good prognosis following a brief spinal manipulation intervention.
    Fritz JM; Childs JD; Flynn TW
    BMC Fam Pract; 2005 Jul; 6(1):29. PubMed ID: 16018809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors of adverse events following chiropractic care for patients with neck pain.
    Rubinstein SM; Leboeuf-Yde C; Knol DL; de Koekkoek TE; Pfeifle CE; van Tulder MW
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Feb; 31(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 18328935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A perspective for considering the risks and benefits of spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain.
    Childs JD; Flynn TW; Fritz JM
    Man Ther; 2006 Nov; 11(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 16839800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate hypoalgesic and motor effects after a single cervical spine manipulation in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia.
    Fernández-Carnero J; Fernández-de-las-Peñas C; Cleland JA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008; 31(9):675-81. PubMed ID: 19028251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in neck pain and active range of motion after a single thoracic spine manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a case series.
    Fernández-de-las-Peñas C; Palomeque-del-Cerro L; Rodríguez-Blanco C; Gómez-Conesa A; Miangolarra-Page JC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 May; 30(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 17509440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonvascular complications following spinal manipulation.
    Oppenheim JS; Spitzer DE; Segal DH
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):660-6; discussion 666-7. PubMed ID: 16291108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between spinal stiffness and outcome in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Ferreira ML; Ferreira PH; Latimer J; Herbert RD; Maher C; Refshauge K
    Man Ther; 2009 Feb; 14(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18164644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term effects of thrust versus nonthrust mobilization/manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.
    Cleland JA; Glynn P; Whitman JM; Eberhart SL; MacDonald C; Childs JD
    Phys Ther; 2007 Apr; 87(4):431-40. PubMed ID: 17341509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre-manipulative testing of the cervical spine review, revision and new clinical guidelines.
    Magarey ME; Rebbeck T; Coughlan B; Grimmer K; Rivett DA; Refshauge K
    Man Ther; 2004 May; 9(2):95-108. PubMed ID: 15040969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors for the immediate responders to cervical manipulation in patients with neck pain.
    Tseng YL; Wang WT; Chen WY; Hou TJ; Chen TC; Lieu FK
    Man Ther; 2006 Nov; 11(4):306-15. PubMed ID: 16380287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient recall of the mechanics of cervical spine manipulation.
    Lewkovich GN; Haneline MT
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005; 28(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 16326241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mild mechanical traumas are possible risk factors for cervical artery dissection.
    Dittrich R; Rohsbach D; Heidbreder A; Heuschmann P; Nassenstein I; Bachmann R; Ringelstein EB; Kuhlenbäumer G; Nabavi DG
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2007; 23(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 17192705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is cervical spinal manipulation dangerous?
    Licht PB; Christensen HW; Høilund-Carlsen PF
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 12532139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lumbar spine segmental mobility assessment: an examination of validity for determining intervention strategies in patients with low back pain.
    Fritz JM; Whitman JM; Childs JD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 86(9):1745-52. PubMed ID: 16181937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benign adverse events following chiropractic care for neck pain are associated with worse short-term outcomes but not worse outcomes at three months.
    Rubinstein SM; Knol DL; Leboeuf-Yde C; van Tulder MW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(25):E950-6. PubMed ID: 19050572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Botulinum toxin type A as migraine preventive treatment in patients previously failing oral prophylactic treatment due to compliance issues.
    Cady R; Schreiber C
    Headache; 2008 Jun; 48(6):900-13. PubMed ID: 18047501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.