These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature. Scales CD; Norris RD; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Peterson BL; Dahm P J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1463-7. PubMed ID: 18710745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based medicine in urology: hope and peril. Niederberger C J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1528-9. PubMed ID: 19230917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine. Berwick DM Qual Saf Health Care; 2005 Oct; 14(5):315-6. PubMed ID: 16195561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: Evidence-based medicine in urology: Hope and Peril C. Niederberger J Urol 2009; 181: 1528-1529. Routh JC; Nelson CP J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1236-7; author reply 1237. PubMed ID: 19625043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The bedrock of daily practice on urology and evidence based medicine. Oliveira Reis L Actas Urol Esp; 2009 Nov; 33(10):1054-6. PubMed ID: 20096173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Barriers to the practice of evidence-based urology. Scales CD; Voils CI; Fesperman SF; Sur RL; Kübler H; Preminger GM; Dahm P J Urol; 2008 Jun; 179(6):2345-9; discussion 2349-50. PubMed ID: 18423732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Introducing levels of evidence to publications in urology. Dahm P; Preminger GM BJU Int; 2007 Aug; 100(2):246-7. PubMed ID: 17532853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-based medicine for the urologist. Evans CP BJU Int; 2004 Jul; 94(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15217418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based plastic surgery: controlled trials in three plastic surgical journals (1990-2005). Momeni A; Becker A; Antes G; Diener MK; Blümle A; Stark GB Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Aug; 61(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 18650619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Re: A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature. C. D. Scales, Jr., R. D. Norris, s. A. Keitz, B. L. Peterson, G. M. Preminger, J. Vieweg and P. Dahm. J Urol 2007; 177: 1090-1095. Mesrobian HG J Urol; 2008 Jun; 179(6):2488-9; author reply 2489. PubMed ID: 18439625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement]. Gøtzsche PC; Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Apr; 167(14):1520-2. PubMed ID: 15887748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews. Turpin DL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The use observation--an observation of use. Does it have to be published?]. Fortunat S Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Oct; 128(42):2215; author reply 2215. PubMed ID: 14562224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]