1264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15245924)
1. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Percutaneous endopyeloplasty: a novel technique.
Desai MM; Gill IS; Carvalhal EF; Kaouk JH; Banks K; Raju R; Raja SS; Meraney AM; Sung GT; Sauer J
J Endourol; 2002 Sep; 16(7):431-43. PubMed ID: 12396434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution.
Knudsen BE; Cook AJ; Watterson JD; Beiko DT; Nott L; Razvi H; Denstedt JD
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 14972459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: outcome of initial 12 procedures.
Iwamura M; Soh S; Irie A; Kadowaki K; Matsusita Y; Fujioka T; Baba S
Int J Urol; 2004 Jul; 11(7):449-55. PubMed ID: 15242351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Small incision combined with laparoscopy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Wu JT; Gao ZL; Shi L; Han BM; Men CP; Zhang P; Xia SJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(22):2728-32. PubMed ID: 19951604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A more "conventional" way to perform percutaneous endopyeloplasty: a feasibility study.
Lezrek M; Bazine K; Moufid K; Asseban M; Qarro A; Alami M; Beddouch A
Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):227-30. PubMed ID: 22055686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Park J; Kim WS; Hong B; Park T; Park HK
Int J Urol; 2008 Jun; 15(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 18422578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty: a novel technique.
Kaouk JH; Kuang W; Gill IS
J Urol; 2002 Jan; 167(1):229-31. PubMed ID: 11743312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases.
Gao ZL; Shi L; Yang MS; Wang L; Yang DD; Sun DK; Liu QZ; Men CP; Wu JT; Zhang P
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 May; 119(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 16732987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: intermediate results.
Tong Q; Zheng L; Tang S; Zeng F; Du Z; Mei H; Wu Z; Pu J; Ruan Q
Urology; 2009 Oct; 74(4):889-93. PubMed ID: 19628268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: experience with 50 cases.
Zhang X; Li HZ; Wang SG; Ma X; Zheng T; Fu B; Zhang J; Ye ZQ
Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):514-7. PubMed ID: 16140068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Hussain A; Whelan P; Piercey K; Kapoor A
Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Szydełko T; Kopeć R; Kasprzak J; Apoznański W; Kołodziej A; Zdrojowy R; Lorenz J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Feb; 19(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18976144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Kojima Y; Sasaki S; Mizuno K; Tozawa K; Hayashi Y; Kohri K
Int J Urol; 2009 May; 16(5):472-6. PubMed ID: 19383038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of stent size on the success of antegrade endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: results of 2 consecutive series.
Danuser H; Hochreiter WW; Ackermann DK; Studer UE
J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):902-9. PubMed ID: 11490243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
