1776 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15246296)
1. Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern?
Serhan H; Slivka M; Albert T; Kwak SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 15246296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between 4.0-mm stainless steel and 4.75-mm titanium alloy single-rod spinal instrumentation for anterior thoracoscopic scoliosis surgery.
Yoon SH; Ugrinow VL; Upasani VV; Pawelek JB; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2173-8. PubMed ID: 18794758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength.
Lindsey C; Deviren V; Xu Z; Yeh RF; Puttlitz CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):1680-7. PubMed ID: 16816763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should the galvanic combination of titanium and stainless steel surgical implants be avoided?
Høl PJ; Mølster A; Gjerdet NR
Injury; 2008 Feb; 39(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 18054018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corrosion on spinal implants.
Kirkpatrick JS; Venugopalan R; Beck P; Lemons J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Jun; 18(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 15905769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Difference in metallic wear distribution released from commercially pure titanium compared with stainless steel plates.
Krischak GD; Gebhard F; Mohr W; Krivan V; Ignatius A; Beck A; Wachter NJ; Reuter P; Arand M; Kinzl L; Claes LE
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Mar; 124(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 14727127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Notch sensitivity of titanium alloy, commercially pure titanium, and stainless steel spinal implants.
Dick JC; Bourgeault CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(15):1668-72. PubMed ID: 11474353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical performance of the new posterior spinal implant: effect of materials, connecting plate, and pedicle screw design.
Chen PQ; Lin SJ; Wu SS; So H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(9):881-6; discussion 887. PubMed ID: 12942002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro corrosion of Ti-6Al-4V and type 316L stainless steel when galvanically coupled with carbon.
Thompson NG; Buchanan RA; Lemons JE
J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 Jan; 13(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 429383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, and cytocompatibility of nitrogen plasma-implanted nickel-titanium alloys: a comparative study with commonly used medical grade materials.
Yeung KW; Poon RW; Chu PK; Chung CY; Liu XY; Lu WW; Chan D; Chan SC; Luk KD; Cheung KM
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Aug; 82(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 17295246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Titanium versus stainless steel for anterior spinal fusions: an analysis of rod stress as a predictor of rod breakage during physiologic loading in a bovine model.
Wedemeyer M; Parent S; Mahar A; Odell T; Swimmer T; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17202891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anodized titanium and stainless steel in contact with CFRP: an electrochemical approach considering galvanic corrosion.
Mueller Y; Tognini R; Mayer J; Virtanen S
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Sep; 82(4):936-46. PubMed ID: 17335021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Galvanic corrosion behavior of orthodontic archwire alloys coupled to bracket alloys.
Iijima M; Endo K; Yuasa T; Ohno H; Hayashi K; Kakizaki M; Mizoguchi I
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):705-11. PubMed ID: 16808581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicycle mechanical performance of titanium and stainless steel transpedicular spine implants.
Pienkowski D; Stephens GC; Doers TM; Hamilton DM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(7):782-8. PubMed ID: 9563108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Wear characteristics of different metal-polyethylene beating surfaces. An experimental study of a new model of knee prosthesis].
Farizon F; Aurelle JL; Rieu J; Bousquet G
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996; 82(6):522-8. PubMed ID: 9122523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical assessment of titanium and stainless steel posterior spinal constructs: effects of absolute/relative loading and frequency on fatigue life and determination of failure modes.
Stambough JL; Genaidy AM; Huston RL; Serhan H; El-khatib F; Sabri EH
J Spinal Disord; 1997 Dec; 10(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 9438811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of mixed alloy combinations on fretting corrosion performance of spinal screw and rod implants.
Mali SA; Singh V; Gilbert JL
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2017 Jul; 105(5):1169-1177. PubMed ID: 27038431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Would CoCr rods provide better correctional forces than stainless steel or titanium for rigid scoliosis curves?
Serhan H; Mhatre D; Newton P; Giorgio P; Sturm P
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Apr; 26(2):E70-4. PubMed ID: 22832558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Thermomechanical effects of spine surgery rods composed of different metals and alloys.
Noshchenko A; Patel VV; Baldini T; Yun L; Lindley EM; Burger EL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(11):870-8. PubMed ID: 20739915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical testing of a smart spinal implant locking mechanism based on nickel-titanium alloy.
Yeung KW; Lu WW; Luk KD; Cheung KM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):2296-303. PubMed ID: 16985456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
