These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1524634)

  • 21. Effect of preparation convergence on retention and seating discrepancy of complete veneer crowns.
    Chan DC; Wilson AH; Barbe P; Cronin RJ; Chung C; Chung K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jan; 32(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 15634303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fit of metal ceramic crowns cast in Au-1.6 wt% Ti alloy for different abutment finish line curvature.
    Tao J; Yoda M; Kimura K; Okuno O
    Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 16038971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of recasting palladium-silver alloy on the fit of crowns with different marginal configurations.
    Lopes MB; Consani S; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):430-4. PubMed ID: 16275302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The marginal fit of cemented galvanoceramic crowns.
    Setz J; Diehl J; Weber H
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 2688668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effect of Various Finish Line Configurations on the Marginal Seal and Occlusal Discrepancy of Cast Full Crowns After Cementation - An In-vitro Study.
    Nemane V; Akulwar RS; Meshram S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Aug; 9(8):ZC18-21. PubMed ID: 26436039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fracture resistance of posterior metal-free polymer crowns.
    Rammelsberg P; Eickemeyer G; Erdelt K; Pospiech P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 11005903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and-core systems.
    Goto Y; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Junge T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 15623997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of preparation convergence on retention and seating discrepancy of complete veneer crowns.
    Chan DC; Wilson AH; Barbe P; Cronin RJ; Chung C; Chung K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):1007-13. PubMed ID: 15387842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of tooth preparation form on the fit of Procera copings.
    Lin MT; Sy-Muñoz J; Muñoz CA; Goodacre CJ; Naylor WP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(6):580-90. PubMed ID: 10023221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
    Ernst CP; Cohnen U; Stender E; Willershausen B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantification of all-ceramic crown margin surface profile from try-in to 1-week post-cementation.
    Good ML; Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 19013703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of cement space and delayed placement on the seating of crowns luted with Vitremer, Fuji Duet and Dyract Cem.
    Wilson PR; Stankiewicz NR
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):240-4. PubMed ID: 10388384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Early erosion of glass-ionomer cement at crown margins.
    Curtis SR; Richards MW; Meiers JC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):553-7. PubMed ID: 8148026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microtensile bond strength between crown and root dentin and two adhesive systems.
    De Goes MF; Giannini M; Foxton RM; Nikaido T; Tagami J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 17499092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.