These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1524642)

  • 1. Fatigue life of porcelain repair systems.
    Llobell A; Nicholls JI; Kois JC; Daly CH
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 1524642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems.
    Diaz-Arnold AM; Wistrom DW; Aquilino SA; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Dec; 6(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 7880478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin.
    Chen JH; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):250-7. PubMed ID: 9863446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates.
    Haselton DR; Diaz-Arnold AM; Dunne JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 11725281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Durability of the resin bond strength to the alumina ceramic Procera.
    Hummel M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):498-508. PubMed ID: 15081557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents.
    Wolf DM; Powers JM; O'Keefe KL
    Dent Mater; 1992 May; 8(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 1521702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems.
    dos Santos JG; Fonseca RG; Adabo GL; dos Santos Cruz CA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Sep; 96(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 16990069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD; Bailey DK; Thompson JY; Pietz DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of hydration on bond strength of a silane-bonded composite to porcelain after seven months.
    Eikenberg S; Shurtleff J
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 8940571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear bond strengths of composite bonded to porcelain using porcelain repair systems.
    Knight JS; Holmes JR; Bradford H; Lawson C
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):252-4. PubMed ID: 14579880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of composite resin-to-porcelain bond strength with three adhesives.
    Kelsey WP; Latta MA; Stanislav CM; Shaddy RS
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):418-21. PubMed ID: 11199616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin.
    Hikita K; Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J; Ikeda T; Van Landuyt K; Maida T; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16426673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin.
    Atsu SS; Kilicarslan MA; Kucukesmen HC; Aka PS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 16765155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress 2.
    Panah FG; Rezai SM; Ahmadian L
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):409-14. PubMed ID: 18717831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentin bond strength of self-etching primers/adhesives.
    Sensi LG; Lopes GC; Monteiro S; Baratieri LN; Vieira LC
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 15765959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bond strength between fibre posts and composite resin cores: effect of post surface silanization.
    Wrbas KT; Schirrmeister JF; Altenburger MJ; Agrafioti A; Hellwig E
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):538-43. PubMed ID: 17459116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro study of the effect of thermo- and load-cycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems.
    Leibrock A; Degenhart M; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 10080310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.