BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15246673)

  • 21. Dynamics of narrow-band EEG phase effects in the passive auditory oddball task.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 24(1):291-304. PubMed ID: 16882025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Single-trial event-related potentials to significant stimuli.
    Rushby JA; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 19703502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory event related potentials and source current density estimation in phonologic/auditory dyslexics.
    Moisescu-Yiflach T; Pratt H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Nov; 116(11):2632-47. PubMed ID: 16221569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ERPs differentiate syllable and nonphonetic sound processing in children and adults.
    Ceponiene R; Alku P; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Jul; 42(4):391-406. PubMed ID: 16008768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory event-related potentials in working memory task.
    Novitski N; Anourova I; Martinkauppi S; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R; Carlson S
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):1320-8. PubMed ID: 14568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Olfactory, auditory, and visual ERPs from single trials: no evidence for habituation.
    Wetter S; Polich J; Murphy C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Nov; 54(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 15331217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Heritability of event-related brain potentials in families with a history of alcoholism.
    Almasy L; Porjesz B; Blangero J; Chorlian DB; O'Connor SJ; Kuperman S; Rohrbaugh J; Bauer LO; Reich T; Polich J; Begleiter H
    Am J Med Genet; 1999 Aug; 88(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 10402506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Event-related potential (ERP) markers of melodic processing: The N2 component is modulated by structural complexity, not by melodic 'meaningfulness'.
    Minati L; Salvatoni L; Rosazza C; Pietrocini E; Visani E; Panzica F; Scaioli V; Avanzini G; Franceschetti S
    Brain Res Bull; 2010 Aug; 83(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 20600678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Event-related potentials to visual, auditory, and bimodal (combined auditory-visual) stimuli.
    Isoğlu-Alkaç U; Kedzior K; Keskindemirci G; Ermutlu N; Karamursel S
    Int J Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 117(2):259-73. PubMed ID: 17365112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of threat of electric shock and diazepam on the N1/P2 auditory-evoked potential elicited by low-intensity auditory stimuli.
    Al-Abduljawad KA; Baqui F; Langley RW; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    J Psychopharmacol; 2008 Nov; 22(8):828-35. PubMed ID: 18208937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Similar sound intensity dependence of the N1 and P2 components of the auditory ERP: Averaged and single trial evidence.
    Paiva TO; Almeida PR; Ferreira-Santos F; Vieira JB; Silveira C; Chaves PL; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):499-508. PubMed ID: 26154993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs.
    Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 17481761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ERP correlates of the magnitude of pitch errors detected in the human voice.
    Scheerer NE; Behich J; Liu H; Jones JA
    Neuroscience; 2013 Jun; 240():176-85. PubMed ID: 23466810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceiving rhythm where none exists: event-related potential (ERP) correlates of subjective accenting.
    Potter DD; Fenwick M; Abecasis D; Brochard R
    Cortex; 2009 Jan; 45(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 19027894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Single-trial latency variability does not contribute to fast habituation of the long-latency averaged auditory evoked potential in the albino rat.
    Specht CM; Shucard DW
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 100(5):462-71. PubMed ID: 8893665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The development of the length of the temporal window of integration for rapidly presented auditory information as indexed by MMN.
    Wang W; Datta H; Sussman E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1695-706. PubMed ID: 15905124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The intensity dependence of auditory ERP components in unmedicated patients with major depression and healthy controls. An analysis of group differences.
    Linka T; Sartory G; Bender S; Gastpar M; Müller BW
    J Affect Disord; 2007 Nov; 103(1-3):139-45. PubMed ID: 17316822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Event-related potentials in adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: an investigation using an inter-modal auditory/visual oddball task.
    Barry RJ; Clarke AR; McCarthy R; Selikowitz M; Brown CR; Heaven PC
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Feb; 71(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 19022305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of inter-stimulus interval (ISI) duration on the N1 and P2 components of the auditory event-related potential.
    Pereira DR; Cardoso S; Ferreira-Santos F; Fernandes C; Cunha-Reis C; Paiva TO; Almeida PR; Silveira C; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25304172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.