409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15246790)
1. Evolution of coordinated alternating reciprocity in repeated dyadic games.
Browning L; Colman AM
J Theor Biol; 2004 Aug; 229(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 15246790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game.
Hauert C; Doebeli M
Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6983):643-6. PubMed ID: 15074318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chaos, oscillation and the evolution of indirect reciprocity in n-person games.
Suzuki S; Akiyama E
J Theor Biol; 2008 Jun; 252(4):686-93. PubMed ID: 18371983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study on emergence of alternating reciprocity in a 2 x 2 game with 2-length memory strategy.
Tanimoto J; Sagara H
Biosystems; 2007; 90(3):728-37. PubMed ID: 17418483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discounting and reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.
Stephens DW; McLinn CM; Stevens JR
Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5601):2216-8. PubMed ID: 12481142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revisiting "The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups": continuous reciprocity in the repeated n-person prisoner's dilemma.
Takezawa M; Price ME
J Theor Biol; 2010 May; 264(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 20144622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reciprocity phase in various 2×2 games by agents equipped with two-memory length strategy encouraged by grouping for interaction and adaptation.
Wakiyama M; Tanimoto J
Biosystems; 2011 Jan; 103(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 21035518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perfect reciprocity is the only evolutionarily stable strategy in the continuous iterated prisoner's dilemma.
André JB; Day T
J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 17397874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A simple scaling of the effectiveness of supporting mutual cooperation in donor-recipient games by various reciprocity mechanisms.
Tanimoto J
Biosystems; 2009 Apr; 96(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19059458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analysis of network reciprocity in Prisoner's Dilemma games using Full Factorial Designs of Experiment.
Yamauchi A; Tanimoto J; Hagishima A
Biosystems; 2011 Jan; 103(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 20955762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
McNamara JM; Barta Z; Houston AI
Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):745-8. PubMed ID: 15085131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assortment and the evolution of generalized reciprocity.
Rankin DJ; Taborsky M
Evolution; 2009 Jul; 63(7):1913-22. PubMed ID: 19222566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cumulative benefit games: achieving cooperation when players discount the future.
Stephens DW
J Theor Biol; 2000 Jul; 205(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 10860696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolutionary escape from the prisoner's dilemma.
Worden L; Levin SA
J Theor Biol; 2007 Apr; 245(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 17169377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolutionary dynamics of the continuous iterated prisoner's dilemma.
Le S; Boyd R
J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 17125798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What controls network reciprocity in the Prisoner's Dilemma game?
Yamauchi A; Tanimoto J; Hagishima A
Biosystems; 2010; 102(2-3):82-7. PubMed ID: 20696209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A mechanism of dynamical interactions for two-person social dilemmas.
Mogielski K; Płatkowski T
J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 19523961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The promotion of cooperation by the poor in dynamic chicken games.
Ito H; Katsumata Y; Hasegawa E; Yoshimura J
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43377. PubMed ID: 28233837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of dispersal and neighbourhood in games of cooperation.
Számadó S; Szalai F; Scheuring I
J Theor Biol; 2008 Jul; 253(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 18440558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Win-stay, lose-shift strategies for repeated games-memory length, aspiration levels and noise.
Posch M
J Theor Biol; 1999 May; 198(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 10339393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
