These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15246790)

  • 1. Evolution of coordinated alternating reciprocity in repeated dyadic games.
    Browning L; Colman AM
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Aug; 229(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 15246790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game.
    Hauert C; Doebeli M
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6983):643-6. PubMed ID: 15074318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chaos, oscillation and the evolution of indirect reciprocity in n-person games.
    Suzuki S; Akiyama E
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Jun; 252(4):686-93. PubMed ID: 18371983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study on emergence of alternating reciprocity in a 2 x 2 game with 2-length memory strategy.
    Tanimoto J; Sagara H
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(3):728-37. PubMed ID: 17418483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discounting and reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.
    Stephens DW; McLinn CM; Stevens JR
    Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5601):2216-8. PubMed ID: 12481142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting "The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups": continuous reciprocity in the repeated n-person prisoner's dilemma.
    Takezawa M; Price ME
    J Theor Biol; 2010 May; 264(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 20144622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reciprocity phase in various 2×2 games by agents equipped with two-memory length strategy encouraged by grouping for interaction and adaptation.
    Wakiyama M; Tanimoto J
    Biosystems; 2011 Jan; 103(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 21035518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perfect reciprocity is the only evolutionarily stable strategy in the continuous iterated prisoner's dilemma.
    André JB; Day T
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 17397874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple scaling of the effectiveness of supporting mutual cooperation in donor-recipient games by various reciprocity mechanisms.
    Tanimoto J
    Biosystems; 2009 Apr; 96(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19059458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analysis of network reciprocity in Prisoner's Dilemma games using Full Factorial Designs of Experiment.
    Yamauchi A; Tanimoto J; Hagishima A
    Biosystems; 2011 Jan; 103(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 20955762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
    McNamara JM; Barta Z; Houston AI
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):745-8. PubMed ID: 15085131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assortment and the evolution of generalized reciprocity.
    Rankin DJ; Taborsky M
    Evolution; 2009 Jul; 63(7):1913-22. PubMed ID: 19222566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cumulative benefit games: achieving cooperation when players discount the future.
    Stephens DW
    J Theor Biol; 2000 Jul; 205(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 10860696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolutionary escape from the prisoner's dilemma.
    Worden L; Levin SA
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Apr; 245(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 17169377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolutionary dynamics of the continuous iterated prisoner's dilemma.
    Le S; Boyd R
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 17125798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What controls network reciprocity in the Prisoner's Dilemma game?
    Yamauchi A; Tanimoto J; Hagishima A
    Biosystems; 2010; 102(2-3):82-7. PubMed ID: 20696209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A mechanism of dynamical interactions for two-person social dilemmas.
    Mogielski K; Płatkowski T
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 19523961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The promotion of cooperation by the poor in dynamic chicken games.
    Ito H; Katsumata Y; Hasegawa E; Yoshimura J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43377. PubMed ID: 28233837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of dispersal and neighbourhood in games of cooperation.
    Számadó S; Szalai F; Scheuring I
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Jul; 253(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 18440558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Win-stay, lose-shift strategies for repeated games-memory length, aspiration levels and noise.
    Posch M
    J Theor Biol; 1999 May; 198(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 10339393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.