215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1524744)
1. Sealed restorations: 5-year results.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Richards EE; Williams JE; Smith CD; Mackert JR; Schuster GS; Sherrer JD; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Wenner KK
Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 1524744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: nine-year results among children and adults.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Adair SM; Sams DR; Curtis JW; Ergle JW; Hawkins KI; Mackert JR; O'Dell NL; Richards EE; Rueggeberg F
ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 7608378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sealed restorations: 4-year results.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Williams JE; Pierce KL; Smith CD; Schuster GS; Mackert JR; Sherrer JD; Wenner KK; Richards EE; Davis QB
Am J Dent; 1991 Feb; 4(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 2003895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Smith CD; Williams JE; Sherrer JD; Mackert JR; Richards EE; Schuster GS; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Kovarik RE
Quintessence Int; 1992 Dec; 23(12):827-38. PubMed ID: 1305301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultraconservative sealed restorations: three-year results.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Williams JE; Schuster GS; Smith CD; Pierce KL; Mackert JR; Sherrer JD; Wenner KK; Davis QB; Garman TA
J Public Health Dent; 1991; 51(4):239-50. PubMed ID: 1941777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical performance of sealed composite restorations placed over caries compared with sealed and unsealed amalgam restorations.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Call-Smith KM; Shuster GS; Williams JE; Davis QB; Smith CD; Bell RA; Sherrer JD; Myers DR; Morse PK
J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Nov; 115(5):689-94. PubMed ID: 3479490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The preventive resin (composite resin/sealant) restoration: nine-year results.
Houpt M; Fukus A; Eidelman E
Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 8008812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The preventive resin restoration: a conservative alternative.
McConnachie I
J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Mar; 58(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 1555123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage and wall adaptation of conservative restorations.
Guelmann M; Bonnin S; Primosch RE; Söderholm KJ
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 12691279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occlusal restoration using fissure sealant instead of "extension for prevention".
Houpt M; Eidelman E; Shey Z; Fuks A; Chosack A; Shapira J
ASDC J Dent Child; 1984; 51(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 6590579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preventive resin restorations and sealants in light of current evidence.
Simonsen RJ
Dent Clin North Am; 2005 Oct; 49(4):815-23, vii. PubMed ID: 16150318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Curtis JW; Ergle JW; Rueggeberg FA; Adair SM
J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jan; 129(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 9448347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
Qin M; Liu H
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial.
Moncada GC; Martin J; Fernandez E; Vildosola PG; Caamano C; Caro MJ; Mjor IA; Gordan VV
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(5):314-8. PubMed ID: 17004564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of fissure caries in the community dental services using sealant restorations: a field trial.
Gray GB; Paterson RC
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Mar; 6(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 9680884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of a sealant on the microleakage of composite resin restorations: an in vivo study.
Akyüz S; Menteş A; Oktay C
J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1992 Sep; 1(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 1308779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.
Mjör IA; Shen C; Eliasson ST; Richter S
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11931133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results.
Baratieri LN; Canabarro S; Lopes GC; Ritter AV
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 14531591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
