These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15248059)

  • 1. Advantages of cyclosporin A using 2-h levels in pediatric kidney transplantation.
    Pape L; Ehrich JH; Offner G
    Pediatr Nephrol; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1035-8. PubMed ID: 15248059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Limitations of cyclosporine C2 monitoring in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
    Hmiel SP; Canter C; Shepherd R; Lassa-Claxton S; Nadler M
    Pediatr Transplant; 2007 Aug; 11(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 17631021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical outcomes and C2 cyclosporin monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: 1 year follow-up study.
    Marcén R; Villafruela JJ; Pascual J; Teruel JL; Ocaña J; Tenorio MT; Burgos FJ; Ortuño J
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 Apr; 20(4):803-10. PubMed ID: 15687111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early cyclosporine C0 and C2 monitoring in de novo kidney transplant patients: a prospective randomized single-center pilot study.
    Kyllönen LE; Salmela KT
    Transplantation; 2006 Apr; 81(7):1010-5. PubMed ID: 16612277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of cyclosporine concentrations 2 hours post-dose determined using 3 different methods and trough level in pediatric renal transplantation.
    Rodríguez E; Delucchi MA; Cano F; Valdebenito S; Castillo MC; Villegas R
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Oct; 37(8):3354-7. PubMed ID: 16298594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cyclosporin A monitoring by 2-h levels: preliminary target levels in stable pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
    Pape L; Lehnhardt A; Latta K; Ehrich JH; Offner G
    Clin Transplant; 2003 Dec; 17(6):546-8. PubMed ID: 14756272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of the absorption profile of cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients: a longitudinal study of the de novo and maintenance phases.
    Büchler M; Chadban S; Cole E; Midtvedt K; Thervet E; Prestele H; Keown P
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Jan; 21(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 16204301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. C2 monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: is it worthwhile?
    Midtvedt K; Fauchald P; Bergan S; Høieggen A; Hallan S; Svarstad E; Bergrem H; Eriksen BO; Pfeffer PF; Dalen I; Leivestad T
    Transplantation; 2003 Oct; 76(8):1236-8. PubMed ID: 14578761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term follow-up of pediatric transplant recipients: mycophenolic acid trough levels are not a good indicator for long-term graft function.
    Pape L; Ehrich JH; Offner G
    Clin Transplant; 2004 Oct; 18(5):576-9. PubMed ID: 15344963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neoral dose monitoring using 2-hour cyclosporine post-dose levels in stable children with liver transplants: improvement in renal function.
    Shapiro R; Waissman I; Mor E; Kleper R; Nussinovitch M; Dinari G; Ben-Ari Z
    Pediatr Transplant; 2003 Dec; 7(6):450-3. PubMed ID: 14870892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of changing from cyclosporine C0 to C2 monitoring in stable recipients following renal transplantation: a prospective cohort study.
    Zhang Y; Zhang XD; Wang Y
    Transplant Proc; 2011 Dec; 43(10):3697-701. PubMed ID: 22172829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantages of C2 monitoring to avoid acute rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
    Schubert S; Abdul-Khaliq H; Lehmkuhl HB; Hübler M; Abd El Rahman MY; Miera O; Ewert P; Weng Y; Wei H; Krüdewagen B; Hetzer R; Berger F
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 Jun; 25(6):619-25. PubMed ID: 16730566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cyclosporine profiling with C2 and C0 monitoring improves outcomes after heart transplantation.
    Barnard JB; Thekkudan J; Richardson S; Bittar MN; Martyszczuck R; Hasan J; Khasati N; Keevil B; Yonan N
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 May; 25(5):564-8. PubMed ID: 16678036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of measured trough levels and abbreviated AUC estimation by limited sampling strategies for monitoring mycophenolic acid exposure in stable heart transplant patients receiving cyclosporin A-containing and cyclosporin A-free immunosuppressive regimens.
    Dösch AO; Ehlermann P; Koch A; Remppis A; Katus HA; Dengler TJ
    Clin Ther; 2006 Jun; 28(6):893-905. PubMed ID: 16860172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of late conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring of microemulsified cyclosporine in pediatric living donor liver transplant recipients.
    Takatsuki M; Chen CL; Chen YS; Wang CC; Lin CC; Yang CH; Yong CC; Liu YW
    Clin Transplant; 2004 Dec; 18(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 15516246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cyclosporine monitoring in the early post-transplant period in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
    Frauca E; Diaz MC; de la Vega A; Hierro L; Camarena C; Muñoz Bartolo G; Díez R; Murcia J; Gámez M; Sanchez Peinado C; López Santamaría M; Andrés I; Jara P
    Pediatr Transplant; 2007 Aug; 11(5):530-5. PubMed ID: 17631022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcomes during the first three months posttransplant in renal allograft recipients managed by C2 monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion.
    Thervet E; Pfeffer P; Scolari MP; Toselli L; Pallardó LM; Chadban S; Pilmore H; Connolly J; Buchler M; Schena FP; Carreño CA; Dandavino R; Cole E
    Transplantation; 2003 Sep; 76(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 14508352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. C2 is superior to C0 as predictor of renal toxicity and rejection risk profile in stable heart transplant recipients.
    Caforio AL; Tona F; Piaserico S; Gambino A; Feltrin G; Fortina AB; Angelini A; Alaibac M; Bontorin M; Calzolari D; Peserico A; Thiene G; Iliceto S; Gerosa G
    Transpl Int; 2005 Jan; 18(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 15612993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the effects of C2-cyclosporine and C0-tacrolimus on renal function and cardiovascular risk factors in kidney transplant recipients.
    Kim SJ; Prasad GV; Huang M; Nash MM; Famure O; Park J; Thenganatt MA; Chowdhury N; Cole EH; Fenton SS; Cattran DC; Zaltzman JS; Cardella CJ
    Transplantation; 2006 Oct; 82(7):924-30. PubMed ID: 17038908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cyclosporine drug monitoring with C0 and C2 concentrations in children with stable renal allograft function.
    Kalyoncu M; Topaloglu R; Bayrakci U; Bakkaloglu A; Besbas N; Ozaltin F; Bakkaloglu M
    Pediatr Transplant; 2006 Mar; 10(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 16573602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.