258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15248571)
1. Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.
Gong X; Vedula AA; Glick SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2183-95. PubMed ID: 15248571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microcalcification detectability using a bench-top prototype photon-counting breast CT based on a Si strip detector.
Cho HM; Ding H; Barber WC; Iwanczyk JS; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4401-10. PubMed ID: 26133636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging.
Glick SJ; Thacker S; Gong X; Liu B
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 17278485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual-energy digital mammography: calibration and inverse-mapping techniques to estimate calcification thickness and glandular-tissue ratio.
Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 12852535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noise equalization for detection of microcalcification clusters in direct digital mammogram images.
McLoughlin KJ; Bones PJ; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 15027524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).
Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Johnston DA; Lemacks MR; Liu X; Whitman GJ; Dryden MJ; Stephens TW; Thompson SK; Krugh KT; Lai CJ
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study.
Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Edwards AV; Kopans DB; Schmidt RA; Papaioannou J; Moore RH
Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1486-93. PubMed ID: 18491543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of slice thickness on detectability in breast CT using a prewhitened matched filter and simulated mass lesions.
Packard NJ; Abbey CK; Yang K; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1818-30. PubMed ID: 22482604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A quantitative method for evaluating the detectability of lesions in digital mammography.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):214-8. PubMed ID: 18319282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An adaptive algorithm for the detection of microcalcifications in simulated low-dose mammography.
Treiber O; Wanninger F; Führ H; Panzer W; Regulla D; Winkler G
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(4):449-66. PubMed ID: 12630741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3-D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters using stereo imaging: algorithm and mammographic unit calibration.
Daul C; Graebling P; Tiedeu A; Wolf D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Dec; 52(12):2058-73. PubMed ID: 16366229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SVM and neural networks comparison in mammographic CAD.
García-Orellana CJ; Gallardo-Caballero R; Macías-Macias M; González-Velasco H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3204-7. PubMed ID: 18002677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21776781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New CR system with pixel size of 50 microm for digital mammography: physical imaging properties and detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Ideguchi T; Higashida Y; Kawaji Y; Sasaki M; Zaizen M; Shibayama R; Nakamura Y; Koyanagi K; Ikeda H; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Muranaka T
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 15468941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High resolution dual detector volume-of-interest cone beam breast CT--Demonstration with a bench top system.
Shen Y; Yi Y; Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Liu X; You Z; Ge S; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6429-42. PubMed ID: 22149826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
