These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15248800)

  • 1. Effects of frequency modulation (FM) transmitter microphone directivity on speech perception in noise.
    Lewis MS; Crandell CC; Kreisman NV
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 15248800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
    Bilsen FA; Soede W; Berkhout AJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception in noise: directional microphones versus frequency modulation (FM) systems.
    Lewis MS; Crandell CC; Valente M; Horn JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 Jun; 15(6):426-39. PubMed ID: 15341224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of an adaptive directional system in a DSP hearing aid.
    Bentler RA; Tubbs JL; Egge JL; Flamme GA; Dittberner AB
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 15248806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Plyler PN; Fleck EL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):616-27. PubMed ID: 16787899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of asymmetric directional microphone fittings on acceptance of background noise.
    Kim JS; Bryan MF
    Int J Audiol; 2011 May; 50(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 21417673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
    Nordrum S; Erler S; Garstecki D; Dhar S
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of adaptive FM systems on speech recognition in noise for listeners who use hearing aids.
    Thibodeau L
    Am J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 19(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 20220201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
    van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Benefit of Remote Microphones Using Four Wireless Protocols.
    Rodemerk KS; Galster JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 26333880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective and subjective hearing aid assessment outcomes.
    Mendel LL
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):118-29. PubMed ID: 18056880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of in-the-ear microphone directionality on sound direction identification.
    Chung K; Neuman AC; Higgins M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2264-75. PubMed ID: 18397031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.