These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15248805)

  • 1. Speech perception by students with cochlear implants using sound-field systems in classrooms.
    Iglehart F
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 15248805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of room acoustics and sound-field amplification on word recognition performance in young adult listeners in suboptimal listening conditions.
    Larsen JB; Vega A; Ribera JE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 17(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 18519579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of sound-field systems on learning and attention in elementary school classrooms.
    Dockrell JE; Shield B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 55(4):1163-76. PubMed ID: 22232398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using personal response systems to assess speech perception within the classroom: an approach to determine the efficacy of sound field amplification in primary school classrooms.
    Vickers DA; Backus BC; Macdonald NK; Rostamzadeh NK; Mason NK; Pandya R; Marriage JE; Mahon MH
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):491-502. PubMed ID: 23340455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception benefits of FM and infrared devices to children with hearing aids in a typical classroom.
    Anderson KL; Goldstein H
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2004 Apr; 35(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15191328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
    Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech Perception in Classroom Acoustics by Children With Cochlear Implants and With Typical Hearing.
    Iglehart F
    Am J Audiol; 2016 Jun; 25(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 27244568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring speech recognition in children with cochlear implants in a virtual classroom.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):532-40. PubMed ID: 22215040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of input processing and type of personal frequency modulation system on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
    Wolfe J; Schafer E; Parkinson A; John A; Hudson M; Wheeler J; Mucci A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 22941405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What matched comparisons can and cannot tell us: the case of cochlear implants.
    Sagi E; Fitzgerald MB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 17609617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting.
    Klatte M; Lachmann T; Meis M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):270-82. PubMed ID: 20871182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.