239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15248885)
1. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry.
Frei C; Buser D; Dula K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 15248885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.
Vazquez L; Saulacic N; Belser U; Bernard JP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17956572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in the pre-surgical treatment planning using conventional spiral tomography.
Diniz AF; Mendonça EF; Leles CR; Guilherme AS; Cavalcante MP; Silva MA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 18237315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.
de Souza LA; Souza Picorelli Assis NM; Ribeiro RA; Pires Carvalho AC; Devito KL
Ann Anat; 2016 May; 205():53-9. PubMed ID: 26851559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
Garg AK; Vicari A
Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
Mehra A; Pai KM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Research methods in dentistry 9. Follow-up of permucosal implants in an edentate mandible using panoramic radiography].
Verhoeven JW; Cune MS
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Mar; 112(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 15792391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A transymphyseal X-ray projection to assess the anterior edentulous mandible prior to implant placement.
Shelley A; Horner K
Dent Update; 2008 Dec; 35(10):689-94. PubMed ID: 19192691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of the vertical magnification factor on panoramic radiographs: clinical implications for posterior mandibular implants.
Vazquez L; Nizam Al Din Y; Christoph Belser U; Combescure C; Bernard JP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 21435009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A comparison of two methods for pre-operative radiographic examination in treatment with oral implants in the anterior mandibular area].
Sewerin I; Skov SJ
Tandlaegebladet; 1992 May; 96(8):331-5. PubMed ID: 1412048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reliability of surgeons to avoid traumatic insertion of dental implants into high-risk regions: a panoramic radiograph study.
Jamil FA; Mohammed JA; Hasan TA; Rzoqi MG
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 32252728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size.
Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 21054555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of bone width lateral to the mandibular canal as an alternative approach for implant installation.
Daróz SR; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23303270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
Garg AK
Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perioperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen.
Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Flygare L; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 11803387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
