These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1524923)

  • 21. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
    Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 12644536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does a positive family history influence the presentation of breast cancer?
    Yip CH; bt Mohd Taib NA; Lau PC
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 18439076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effectiveness of screening for breast cancer in women under 50 years at entry: the Kotka pilot project in Finland.
    Hakama M; Pukkala E; Kallio M; Godenhjelm K; Svinhufvud U
    Int J Cancer; 1995 Sep; 63(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 7558452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Favourable prognostic factors of subsequent screen-detected breast cancers among women aged 50-69.
    Chiarelli AM; Edwards SA; Sheppard AJ; Mirea L; Chong N; Paszat L; Shumak RS; Oʼmalley FP;
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2012 Nov; 21(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 22273849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Thermography with glucose loading in the examination of women at high risk of developing breast cancer].
    Gabuniia RI; Shapot VS; Letiagin VL; Bogdasarov IuB; Lenskaia OP; Kurdiukova LN
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1990 Feb; 35(2):20-2. PubMed ID: 2314199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Assessment of mammography screening and its introduction in Germany in the Statutory Early Diagnosis Program].
    von Fournier D
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10209861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Thermography of the female breast: a five-year study in relation to the detection and prognosis of cancer.
    Jones CH; Greening WP; Davey JB; McKinna JA; Greeves VJ
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Jul; 48(571):532-8. PubMed ID: 1148585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening women with a family history of breast cancer--results from the British Familial Breast Cancer Group.
    Macmillan RD
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Mar; 26(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 10744933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Breast care--an overview.
    White E
    Nurs Times; 2000 Oct 5-11; 96(40):35-6. PubMed ID: 11968641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Experience and outlook for the work of the All-Union Center for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer].
    Semiglazov VF; Vesnin AG; Chernomordikova MF; Zvontsova KM; Orlov AA
    Vopr Onkol; 1984; 30(10):60-4. PubMed ID: 6238480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Opportunistic breast cancer screening in Hong Kong; a revisit of the Kwong Wah Hospital experience.
    Lui CY; Lam HS; Chan LK; Tam KF; Chan CM; Leung TY; Mak KL
    Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Apr; 13(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 17406037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.
    Wanders JOP; Holland K; Karssemeijer N; Peeters PHM; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; van Gils CH
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jun; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 28583146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New screening techniques for breast cancer (MRI).
    Gilbert FJ
    Dis Markers; 1999 Oct; 15(1-3):115-6. PubMed ID: 10595263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up?
    Taplin SH; Ichikawa L; Yood MU; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Mouchawar J; Leyden WA; Altaras R; Beverly RK; Casso D; Westbrook EO; Bischoff K; Zapka JG; Barlow WE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(20):1518-27. PubMed ID: 15494602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tumour characteristics of bilateral screen-detected cancers and bilateral interval cancers in women participating at biennial screening mammography.
    van Bommel R; Lameijer JRC; Voogd AC; Nederend J; Louwman MWJ; Setz-Pels W; Strobbe LJ; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LE
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():215-221. PubMed ID: 30396659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breast cancer screening: significance of minimal breast cancers.
    Moskowitz M
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1984; 90():118-24. PubMed ID: 6701368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.