101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15250093)
1. An experiment in saving lives: emergency patients unwittingly get artificial blood.
Stein R
Washington Post; 2004 Mar; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 15250093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial-blood study has critics seeing red.
Guterman L
Chron High Educ; 2006 Jun; 52(41):A17. PubMed ID: 16856302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Guinea pigs in the ER: researchers debate the ethics and logistics of performing emergency research without patients' consent.
Guterman L
Chron High Educ; 2006 Jun; 52(41):A14-8. PubMed ID: 16856301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of substitution for blood draws ethics challenge.
Burton TM
Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Mar; ():A2. PubMed ID: 16642578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A bad case of not asking for consent.
Westphal SP
New Sci; 2004 Apr 24-30; 182(2444):20-1. PubMed ID: 15248315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Trials and errors: barriers to oversight of research conducted under the emergency research consent waiver.
Kipnis K; King NM; Nelson RM
IRB; 2006; 28(2):16-9. PubMed ID: 16770884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. FDA to weigh using fake blood in trauma trial.
Burton TM
Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Jul; ():B1, B2. PubMed ID: 16909496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Source data verification in clinical trials involving the temporarily incapacitated subject: is there a missing link in the notion of proxy consent?
Wilson JR
IRB; 1992; 14(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11651394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An update on the PEG-SOD study involving incompetent subjects: FDA permits an exception to informed consent requirements.
Prentice ED; Antonson DL; Leibrock LG; Prabhu VC; Kelso TK; Sears TD
IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):16-8. PubMed ID: 11652322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A life and death dilemma..
Coghlan A
New Sci; 2006 Oct 21-27; 192(2574):8-9. PubMed ID: 17165219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Blood-substitute study is criticized by U.S. agency.
Burton TM
Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Mar; ():A3. PubMed ID: 16578912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Americans should not be on a game show in U.S. emergency rooms and ambulances.
Grassley C
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):9-10. PubMed ID: 20945261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioethics group divided over research on mentally ill.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1998 Nov; ():A6. PubMed ID: 11648074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Using the brain dead for medical research.
Martyn SR
Utah Law Rev; 1986; 1986(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 11651917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogate consent and the incompetent experimental subject.
Bein PM
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1991 Sep; 46(5):739-71. PubMed ID: 11651381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The using of Baby Fae.
Krauthammer C
Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the final rule on the conduct of emergency clinical research.
Gonzalez SK; Helling TS
J Trauma; 2008 Jun; 64(6):1665-72. PubMed ID: 18545136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An open letter to institutional review boards considering Northfield Laboratories' PolyHeme trial.
Kipnis K; King NM; Nelson RM
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):18-21. PubMed ID: 16754441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Emergency trials 'by popular consent.
Kiernan V
New Sci; 1995 Nov; 148(2002):6. PubMed ID: 11656475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.
Moore DL
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
