These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15250123)

  • 1. The effect of initial stimulus type for visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Shaw P; Nikolopoulos T
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Apr; 43(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 15250123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Visual reinforcement audiometry with different sound stimuli in children].
    Vieira EP; Azevedo MF
    Pro Fono; 2007; 19(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 17710345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An innovation in insert visual reinforcement audiometry in children.
    Jayarajan V; Nandi R; Caldicott B
    J Laryngol Otol; 2005 Feb; 119(2):132-3. PubMed ID: 15829066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A longitudinal study comparing responses of hearing-impaired infants to pure tones using visual reinforcement and play audiometry.
    Talbott CB
    Ear Hear; 1987 Jun; 8(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 3609514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) with young Down's syndrome children.
    Greenberg DB; Wilson WR; Moore JM; Thompson G
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1978 Nov; 43(4):448-58. PubMed ID: 153435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: hearing status at 8 to 12 months corrected age using a visual reinforcement audiometry protocol.
    Widen JE; Folsom RC; Cone-Wesson B; Carty L; Dunnell JJ; Koebsell K; Levi A; Mancl L; Ohlrich B; Trouba S; Gorga MP; Sininger YS; Vohr BR; Norton SJ
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):471-87. PubMed ID: 11059705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
    Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) to low-functioning children.
    Thompson G; Wilson WR; Moore JM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1979 Feb; 44(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 423558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence on the efficacy of insert earphone and sound field VRA with young infants.
    Day J; Bamford J; Parry G; Shepherd M; Quigley A
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 34(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 11201319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experience with the audiologic assessment of infants and toddlers.
    Gravel JS; Traquina DN
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1992 Jan; 23(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 1592552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: results of visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Widen JE; Johnson JL; White KR; Gravel JS; Vohr BR; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Weirather Y; Meyer S
    Am J Audiol; 2005 Dec; 14(2):S200-16. PubMed ID: 16489864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory responsiveness of premature infants utilizing visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA).
    Moore JM; Thompson G; Folsom RC
    Ear Hear; 1992 Jun; 13(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 1397759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual reinforcement audiometry using digital video disc and conventional reinforcers.
    Schmida MJ; Peterson HJ; Tharpe AM
    Am J Audiol; 2003 Jun; 12(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 12894866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforced and nonreinforced head-turn responses of infants as a function of stimulus bandwidth.
    Thompson G; Folsom RC
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 4007296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of two conditioning procedures in the use of visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA).
    Thompson G; Folsom RC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Aug; 49(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 6540335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimal response levels for visual reinforcement audiometry in infants.
    Parry G; Hacking C; Bamford J; Day J
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Oct; 42(7):413-7. PubMed ID: 14582637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of reinforcer duration on the response behavior of preterm 2-year-olds in visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Culpepper B; Thompson G
    Ear Hear; 1994 Apr; 15(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 8020648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a behavioral audiometry simulator for teaching visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Durham JA; Thelin JW; Muenchen RA; Halpin CF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Nov; 5(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 7858304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: infants with hearing loss.
    Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Sininger YS; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Gorga MP; Norton SJ
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):488-507. PubMed ID: 11059706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adding objectivity to infant behavioral audiometry.
    Widen JE
    Ear Hear; 1993 Feb; 14(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 8444338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.