These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15250781)

  • 1. Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis.
    Murray WS; Forster KI
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):721-56. PubMed ID: 15250781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The rank hypothesis and lexical decision: a reply to Adelman and Brown (2008).
    Murray WS; Forster KI
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):240-52. PubMed ID: 18211198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling lexical decision: the form of frequency and diversity effects.
    Adelman JS; Brown GD
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):214-29. PubMed ID: 18211194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Syllables and bigrams: orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels.
    Conrad M; Carreiras M; Tamm S; Jacobs AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):461-79. PubMed ID: 19331501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrasting effects of age of acquisition in lexical decision and letter detection.
    Assink EM; van Well S; Knuijt PP
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 14503391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model-generated lexical activity predicts graded ERP amplitudes in lexical decision.
    Braun M; Jacobs AM; Hahne A; Ricker B; Hofmann M; Hutzler F
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1073-1074():431-9. PubMed ID: 16464440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision.
    Sears CR; Campbell CR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1040-62. PubMed ID: 16846296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun-noun compounds.
    Gagné CL; Spalding TL
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):478-86. PubMed ID: 15172564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of low-spatial frequencies in lexical decision and masked priming.
    Boden C; Giaschi D
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Apr; 69(3):580-91. PubMed ID: 19168272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
    Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: an eye-movement study.
    Hutzler F; Conrad M; Jacobs AM
    Brain Lang; 2005 Feb; 92(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 15629488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: an event-related potential study.
    Hutzler F; Bergmann J; Conrad M; Kronbichler M; Stenneken P; Jacobs AM
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Dec; 372(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 15542236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.
    Samson D; Pillon A
    Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The left fusiform area is affected by written frequency of words.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Adorni R
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2292-9. PubMed ID: 18485421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: evidence for nonselective lexical access.
    Duyck W; Assche EV; Drieghe D; Hartsuiker RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):663-79. PubMed ID: 17576146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development of the orthographic consistency effect in speech recognition: from sublexical to lexical involvement.
    Ventura P; Morais J; Kolinsky R
    Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):547-76. PubMed ID: 17250820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.