These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15250781)

  • 21. Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.
    Rabovsky M; Alvarez CJ; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():156-65. PubMed ID: 18585684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of word length on lexical decision in dyslexic and normal reading children.
    Martens VE; de Jong PF
    Brain Lang; 2006 Aug; 98(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 16690111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.
    Lien MC; Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Grabbe J; McCann RS; Remington RW
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):431-47. PubMed ID: 16953708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition.
    Davis CJ; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):668-87. PubMed ID: 16822131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments.
    Larsen RJ; Mercer KA; Balota DA
    Emotion; 2006 Feb; 6(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 16637750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The cross-script length effect: further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud.
    Rastle K; Havelka J; Wydell TN; Coltheart M; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19210093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Syllabic priming in lexical decision and naming tasks: the syllable congruency effect re-examined in French.
    Chetail F; Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 19271815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
    Alija M; Cuetos F
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Symbol-string sensitivity and adult performance in lexical decision.
    Pammer K; Lavis R; Cooper C; Hansen PC; Cornelissen PL
    Brain Lang; 2005 Sep; 94(3):278-96. PubMed ID: 16098378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determining the time course of lexical frequency and age of acquisition using ERP.
    Cuetos F; Barbón A; Urrutia M; Domínguez A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):285-94. PubMed ID: 19101202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The many places of frequency: evidence for a novel locus of the lexical frequency effect in word production.
    Knobel M; Finkbeiner M; Caramazza A
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Mar; 25(2):256-86. PubMed ID: 18568814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of voice onset time differences on lexical access in Dutch.
    van Alphen PM; McQueen JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):178-96. PubMed ID: 16478335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differential activation of frontal and parietal regions during visual word recognition: an optical topography study.
    Hofmann MJ; Herrmann MJ; Dan I; Obrig H; Conrad M; Kuchinke L; Jacobs AM; Fallgatter AJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 Apr; 40(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 18262438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
    O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lexical access in early stages of visual word processing: a single-trial correlational MEG study of heteronym recognition.
    Solomyak O; Marantz A
    Brain Lang; 2009 Mar; 108(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 19004492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006).
    Estes Z; Adelman JS
    Emotion; 2008 Aug; 8(4):441-4; discussion 445-57. PubMed ID: 18729575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
    Sereno SC; O'Donnell PJ; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 16634674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.