359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15250864)
1. Optimization of atrial defibrillation with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 15250864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coronary sinus electrode does not reduce atrial defibrillation thresholds.
Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Scheiner A; Peters RW; Ma C; Gold MR
Heart Rhythm; 2006 Jun; 3(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 16731464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Brown T; Peters RW; Gold MR
Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15851265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.
Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Zienciuk A; Królak T; Kempa M; Pazdyga A; Raczak G; Swiatecka G
Kardiol Pol; 2005 Sep; 63(3):234-41; discussion 242-3. PubMed ID: 16180177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements.
Schulte B; Sperzel J; Carlsson J; Schwarz T; Ehrlich W; Pitschner HF; Neuzner J
Europace; 2001 Jul; 3(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11467457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atrial defibrillation with a transvenous lead: a randomized comparison of active can shocking pathways.
Cooklin M; Olsovsky MR; Brockman RG; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Aug; 34(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 10440146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal electrode position for transvenous defibrillation: a prospective randomized study.
Stajduhar KC; Ott GY; Kron J; McAnulty JH; Oliver RP; Reynolds BT; Adler SW; Halperin BD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 8522716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examination of a middle cardiac vein defibrillation coil as stand-alone anode, auxiliary anode, and bystander electrode in a transvenous defibrillation circuit.
Paisey JR; Yue AM; Bessoule F; Allen S; Roberts PR; Morgan JM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Aug; 27(8):1089-93. PubMed ID: 15305957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds.
Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; DeGroot PJ; Cuello C; Shorofsky SR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 10695457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative comparison of a subthreshold test pulse with the standard high-energy shock approach for the measurement of defibrillation lead impedance.
Schuchert A; Winter J; Binner L; Kühl M; Meinertz T;
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jan; 17(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 16426402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Estimation of defibrillation threshold using abdominally implanted cardioverter-defibrillator with an additional defibrillation pole in a dual-coil lead endocardial defibrillation system].
Pazdyga A; Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Królak T; Kempa M; Zienciuk A; Raczak G
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Feb; 22(128):86-9. PubMed ID: 17598649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of defibrillation thresholds using monodirectional electrical vector versus bidirectional electrical vector.
Libero L; Lozano IF; Bocchiardo M; Marcolongo M; Sallusti L; Madrid A; Gaita F; Trevi GP
Ital Heart J; 2001 Jun; 2(6):449-55. PubMed ID: 11453582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lead system optimization for transvenous defibrillation.
Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(9):1163-7. PubMed ID: 9359543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of rapid biphasic shock subpulse switching on ventricular defibrillation thresholds.
Dosdall DJ; Rothe DE; Brandon TA; Sweeney JD
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 15250866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Tuned" defibrillation waveforms outperform 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms: a randomized multi-center study.
Natarajan S; Henthorn R; Burroughs J; Esberg D; Zweibel S; Ross T; Kroll M; Gianola D; Oza A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S139-42. PubMed ID: 17302691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Achieving sufficient safety margins with fixed duration waveforms and the use of multiple time constants.
Keane D; Aweh N; Hynes B; Sheahan RG; Cripps T; Bashir Y; Zaidi A; Fahy G; Lowe M; Doherty P; Kroll MK
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 May; 30(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 17461867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of biventricular and conventional transvenous defibrillation: a computational study using patient derived models.
Mocanu D; Kettenbach J; Sweeney MO; Kikinis R; Kenknight BH; Eisenberg SR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 27(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 15125713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Atrial defibrillation thresholds of electrode configurations available to an atrioventricular defibrillator.
Benser ME; Walcott GP; Killingsworth CR; Girouard SD; Morris MM; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 11513449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
