These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15253366)

  • 1. Geometric accuracy in robot-assisted total hip replacement surgery.
    Schneider J; Kalender W
    Comput Aided Surg; 2003; 8(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 15253366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dimensional accuracy for preparation of the femoral cavity in HIP arthroplasty. A comparison between manual- and robot-assisted implantation of hip endoprosthesis stems in cadaver femurs.
    Prymka M; Wu L; Hahne HJ; Koebke J; Hassenpflug J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jan; 126(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16341537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A semi-active milling procedure in view of preparing implantation beds in robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery.
    Van Ham G; Denis K; Vander Sloten J; Van Audekercke R; Van der Perre G; De Schutter J; Simon JP; Fabry G
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 May; 219(3):163-74. PubMed ID: 15934392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Primary rotatory stability of hip endoprostheses stems after manual and robot assisted implantation].
    Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15250002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures.
    Schulz AP; Seide K; Queitsch C; von Haugwitz A; Meiners J; Kienast B; Tarabolsi M; Kammal M; Jürgens C
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Dec; 3(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 18000945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study.
    Honl M; Dierk O; Gauck C; Carrero V; Lampe F; Dries S; Quante M; Schwieger K; Hille E; Morlock MM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Aug; 85(8):1470-8. PubMed ID: 12925626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive registration for computer-assisted orthopedic surgery: combining tracked ultrasound and bone surface points via the P-IMLOP algorithm.
    Billings S; Kang HJ; Cheng A; Boctor E; Kazanzides P; Taylor R
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Jun; 10(6):761-71. PubMed ID: 25895079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Primary rotatory stability of robot-assisted and manually implanted hip endoprosthesis stems].
    Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J
    Unfallchirurg; 2004 Apr; 107(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 14999372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and feasibility of frameless stereotactic and robot-assisted CT-based puncture in interventional radiology: a comparative phantom study.
    Stoffner R; Augschöll C; Widmann G; Böhler D; Bale R
    Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):851-8. PubMed ID: 19517342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation.
    Nawabi DH; Conditt MA; Ranawat AS; Dunbar NJ; Jones J; Banks S; Padgett DE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Mar; 227(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 23662346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary application of computer-assisted patient-specific acetabular navigational template for total hip arthroplasty in adult single development dysplasia of the hip.
    Zhang YZ; Chen B; Lu S; Yang Y; Zhao JM; Liu R; Li YB; Pei GX
    Int J Med Robot; 2011 Dec; 7(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 22113980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The primary stability between manual and robot assisted implantation of hip prostheses: A biomechanical study on synthetic femurs].
    Decking J; Gerber A; Kränzlein J; Meurer A; Böhm B; Plitz W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15250003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted hip resurfacing surgery using the acrobot navigation system.
    Barrett AR; Davies BL; Gomes MP; Harris SJ; Henckel J; Jakopec M; Kannan V; Rodriguez y Baena FM; Cobb JP
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Oct; 221(7):773-85. PubMed ID: 18019464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
    Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
    Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Wu LD; Hahne HJ; Hassenpflug J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci; 2004 Oct; 5(10):1270-8. PubMed ID: 15362200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical accuracy evaluation of femoral canal preparation using the ROBODOC system.
    Nishihara S; Sugano N; Nishii T; Tanaka H; Nakamura N; Yoshikawa H; Ochi T
    J Orthop Sci; 2004; 9(5):452-61. PubMed ID: 15449120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does haptic robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty better restore native acetabular and femoral anatomy?
    Tsai TY; Dimitriou D; Li JS; Kwon YM
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Jun; 12(2):288-95. PubMed ID: 25906764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Early results of a prospective study in patients with computer-assisted femur shaft preparation in total hip endoprosthesis implantation (Robodoc system)--indications, outcome, complications].
    Okoniewski M; Birke A; Schietsch U; Thoma M; Hein W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000; 138(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 11199416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional A-mode ultrasound calibration and registration for robotic orthopaedic knee surgery.
    Mozes A; Chang TC; Arata L; Zhao W
    Int J Med Robot; 2010 Mar; 6(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 20014154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Hodgson A; Helmy N; Masri BA; Greidanus NV; Inkpen KB; Duncan CP; Garbuz DS; Anglin C
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Oct; 221(7):713-24. PubMed ID: 18019459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.