These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15253734)

  • 1. Ionic dialysance allows an adequate estimate of urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients.
    Di Filippo S; Manzoni C; Andrulli S; Pontoriero G; Dell'Oro C; La Milia V; Tentori F; Crepaldi M; Bigi MC; Locatelli F
    Kidney Int; 2004 Aug; 66(2):786-91. PubMed ID: 15253734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Urea distribution volume and ionic dialysance].
    Pozzoni P; Pozzi M; Di Filippo S
    G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 30():S226-30. PubMed ID: 15750991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Urea distribution volume calculated by ionic dialysance].
    Teruel JL; Merino JL; Fernández-Lucas M; Tenorio MT; Rivera M; Marcén R; Ortuño J
    Nefrologia; 2006; 26(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 16649433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a modified urea kinetic model direct dialysis quantification and classic urea kinetic modeling.
    Bosticardo GM; Avalle U; Giacchino F; Alloatti S
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(3):M798-800. PubMed ID: 8573918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between urea clearance and ionic dialysance determined using a single-step conductivity profile.
    Di Filippo S; Pozzoni P; Manzoni C; Andrulli S; Pontoriero G; Locatelli F
    Kidney Int; 2005 Nov; 68(5):2389-95. PubMed ID: 16221245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What volume to choose to assess online Kt/V?
    Casino FG; Mancini E; Santarsia G; Mostacci SD; D'Elia F; Di Carlo M; Iannuzzella F; Rossi L; Vernaglione L; Grimaldi D; Rapanà R; Basile C
    J Nephrol; 2020 Feb; 33(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 31392658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ionic dialysance as a method for the on-line monitoring of delivered dialysis without blood sampling.
    Manzoni C; Di Filippo S; Corti M; Locatelli F
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1996 Oct; 11(10):2023-30. PubMed ID: 8918717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring.
    Wuepper A; Tattersall J; Kraemer M; Wilkie M; Edwards L
    Kidney Int; 2003 Dec; 64(6):2262-71. PubMed ID: 14633151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ionic dialysance and the assessment of Kt/V: the influence of different estimates of V on method agreement.
    Moret K; Beerenhout CH; van den Wall Bake AW; Gerlag PG; van der Sande FM; Leunissen KM; Kooman JP
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Aug; 22(8):2276-82. PubMed ID: 17550929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Ionic dialysance: which relationship with effective urea clearance?].
    Pozzoni P; Pozzi M; Di Filippo S
    G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 30():S231-5. PubMed ID: 15750994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Urea kinetics during sustained low-efficiency dialysis in critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy.
    Marshall MR; Golper TA; Shaver MJ; Alam MG; Chatoth DK
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Mar; 39(3):556-70. PubMed ID: 11877575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anthropometry-based equations overestimate the urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients.
    Kloppenburg WD; Stegeman CA; de Jong PE; Huisman RM
    Kidney Int; 2001 Mar; 59(3):1165-74. PubMed ID: 11231375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconciliation between urea kinetics and direct dialysis quantification.
    Casino FG; Gaudiano V; Santarsia G; Ambrosecchia R; Mostacci SD; Bagnato C; Lopez T
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1992; 7(10):1007-12. PubMed ID: 1331874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chronic hemodialysis: Kt/V or solute removal index to evaluate the effective delivered dose?
    Di Filippo S; Manzoni C; Corti M; Locatelli F
    Int J Artif Organs; 1998 Sep; 21(9):509-14. PubMed ID: 9828055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of postdialysis urea rebound on the quantification of pediatric hemodialysis.
    Marsenić O; Pavlicić D; Bigović G; Peco-Antić A; Jovanović O
    Nephron; 2000 Feb; 84(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 10657712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the ionic dialysance monitor on Kt measurement in hemodialysis.
    Maduell F; Vera M; Arias M; Serra N; Blasco M; Bergadá E; Fontsere N; Cases A; Campistol JM
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Jul; 52(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 18455852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitating hemodialysis: a comparison of three kinetic models.
    Flanigan MJ; Fangman J; Lim VS
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1991 Mar; 17(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 1996572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose.
    Di Filippo S; Andrulli S; Manzoni C; Corti M; Locatelli F
    Kidney Int; 1998 Jul; 54(1):263-7. PubMed ID: 9648087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and clinical utility of dialysis dose measurement using online ionic dialysance.
    Katopodis KP; Hoenich NA
    Clin Nephrol; 2002 Mar; 57(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 11924753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of iohexol to quantify hemodialysis delivered and residual renal function: technical note.
    Sacamay TE; Bolton WK
    Kidney Int; 1998 Sep; 54(3):986-91. PubMed ID: 9734627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.