166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15253822)
1. Retrograde acucise endopyelotomy: is it worth its cost?
Sofras F; Livadas K; Alivizatos G; Deliveliotis Ch; Albanis S; Melekos M; Christoforidis K
J Endourol; 2004 Jun; 18(5):466-8. PubMed ID: 15253822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty.
Baldwin DD; Dunbar JA; Wells N; McDougall EM
J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12803987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Skeldon S; Dave S; Bagli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL; Farhat WA
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2571-5; discussion 2575. PubMed ID: 17945304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Anterograde endopyelotomy].
Surur DM; Iglesias Prieto JI; Mancebo Gómez JM; Massarra Halabi J; Pérez-Castro Ellendt E
Arch Esp Urol; 2002 May; 55(4):431-8. PubMed ID: 12094488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acucise endopyelotomy.
Nakada SY
Urology; 2000 Feb; 55(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 10688094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a decision tree analysis.
Gettman M; Lotan Y; Roerhborn CG; Cadeddu JA; Pearle MS
J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):228-32. PubMed ID: 12478142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acucise endopyelotomy: a technique with limited efficacy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults.
Weikert S; Christoph F; Müller M; Schostak M; Miller K; Schrader M
Int J Urol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 16323978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endopyelotomy review.
Bernardo N; Smith AD
Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Jun; 52(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 10427896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.
Brooks JD; Kavoussi LR; Preminger GM; Schuessler WW; Moore RG
Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):791-5. PubMed ID: 7502417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective, randomized comparison of ureteroscopic endopyelotomy using holmium:YAG laser and balloon catheter.
el-Nahas AR; Shoma AM; Eraky I; el-Kenawy MR; el-Kappany HA
J Urol; 2006 Feb; 175(2):614-8; discussion 618. PubMed ID: 16407007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy: a single-center experience.
Matin SF; Yost A; Streem SB
J Endourol; 2003 Aug; 17(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 12965067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ureteral access sheath facilitates inspection of incision of ureteropelvic junction.
Auge BK; Wu NZ; Pietrow PK; Delvecchio FC; Preminger GM
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):1070-3. PubMed ID: 12576848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy for the treatment of primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Gerber GS; Kim J; Nold S; Cromie WJ
Tech Urol; 2000 Mar; 6(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 10708150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Wyler SF; Bachmann A; Casella R; Gasser T; Sulser T
J Endourol; 2004 Dec; 18(10):948-51. PubMed ID: 15801360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endopyelotomy: importance of crossing vessels demonstrated by endoluminal ultrasonography.
Bagley DH; Liu JB; Goldberg BB; Grasso M
J Endourol; 1995 Dec; 9(6):465-7. PubMed ID: 8775076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
