These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15253962)

  • 1. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.
    Kupfahl C; Honold M; Meinhardt G; Vogelsberg H; Wagner A; Mahrholdt H; Sechtem U
    Heart; 2004 Aug; 90(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 15253962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation.
    Reant P; Lederlin M; Lafitte S; Serri K; Montaudon M; Corneloup O; Roudaut R; Laurent F
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 16873006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The complementary role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients with aortic stenosis.
    Thomas B; Freitas A; Ferreira R; Tavares NJ
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 24(9):1117-21. PubMed ID: 16335285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
    Lembcke A; Kivelitz DE; Borges AC; Lachnitt A; Hein PA; Dohmen PM; Thiele H
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jan; 44(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 19060789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3-T magnetic resonance for determination of aortic valve area: a comparison to echocardiography.
    Speiser U; Quick S; Haas D; Youssef A; Waessnig NK; Ibrahim K; Strasser RH; Schoen S
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2014 Jun; 48(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 24650089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Bohl S; Buschmann EE; Abdel-Aty H; Dietz R; Schulz-Menger J
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(5):397-404, 2 p following 404. PubMed ID: 19808628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hakki's formula for measurement of aortic valve area by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Puymirat E; Chassaing S; Trinquart L; Barbey C; Chaudeurge A; Bar O; Blanchard D
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 106(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 20599011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 17630357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice.
    Levy F; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Hugues N; Alexandrescu C; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Nov; 109(11):618-625. PubMed ID: 27692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.
    Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Barkhausen J; Gutersohn A; Buck T; Bartel T; Erbel R
    Cardiology; 2008; 109(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 17713328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of the aortic valve stenosis: an in vivo and ex vivo study.
    Buchner S; Debl K; Schmid FX; Luchner A; Djavidani B
    BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Aug; 15():34. PubMed ID: 26306577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach.
    Goland S; Trento A; Iida K; Czer LS; De Robertis M; Naqvi TZ; Tolstrup K; Akima T; Luo H; Siegel RJ
    Heart; 2007 Jul; 93(7):801-7. PubMed ID: 17488766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis.
    Bernard Y; Meneveau N; Vuillemenot A; Magnin D; Anguenot T; Schiele F; Bassand JP
    Heart; 1997 Jul; 78(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 9290405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Planimetry of the Orifice Area in Aortic Valve Stenosis Using Phase-Contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Abe H; Iguchi N; Utanohara Y; Takada K; Hen Y; Machida H; Takeda N; Sumiyoshi T
    Int Heart J; 2018 Jan; 59(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 29279525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Burgstahler C; Kunze M; Löffler C; Gawaz MP; Hombach V; Merkle N
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006; 8(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 17060105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Precision of forty slice spiral computed tomography for quantifying aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography and validation against cardiac catheterization.
    Lembcke A; Thiele H; Lachnitt A; Enzweiler CN; Wagner M; Hein PA; Eddicks S; Kivelitz DE
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Oct; 43(10):719-28. PubMed ID: 18791414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.
    Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.