These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15255004)

  • 1. Gene therapy, fundamental rights, and the mandates of public health.
    Lynch J
    J Biolaw Bus; 2004; 7(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 15255004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The implications of the due process clause on the future of human embryonic gene therapy.
    Stine A
    Ariz Law Rev; 2003; 45(2):507-32. PubMed ID: 15378829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Autonomy's magic wand: abortion and constitutional interpretation.
    Allen AL
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1992 Sep; 72(4):683-98. PubMed ID: 11656223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. roe v. Wade: the right of privacy revisited.
    Wheeler LA; Kovar SL
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1973; 21(4):527-48. PubMed ID: 11663470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion and a nation at war.
    First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany.
    Morris DG
    Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two ships passing in the night: an interpretavist review of the White-Stevens colloquy on Roe v. Wade.
    Horan DJ; Forsythe CD; Grant ER
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1987; 6(2):229-311. PubMed ID: 16086461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA
    Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The biological alteration cases.
    Gelman S
    William Mary Law Rev; 1995 May; 36(4):1203-301. PubMed ID: 11660332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion as liberty and right.
    Hobin TJ
    Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 16320459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
    Segers MC
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion.
    Koppelman A
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medicine, eugenics, and the Supreme Court: from coercive sterilization to reproductive freedom.
    Lombardo PA
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 9068235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From involuntary sterilization to genetic enhancement: the unsettled legacy of Buck v. Bell.
    Berry RM
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):401-48. PubMed ID: 12755089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.