285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15255061)
1. The fox guarding the henhouse: how the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and State peer review protection statutes have helped protect bad faith peer review in the medical community.
van Geertruyden YH
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 18(1):239-71. PubMed ID: 15255061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?
Donovan RE
J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The future for peer review. Florida's constitutional amendment chills quality community.
Glabman M
Trustee; 2005 Apr; 58(4):6-10, 12, 1. PubMed ID: 15881498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
Cross LL
Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now?
Brennan ED
QRC Advis; 1999 Nov; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10622805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Facing the limits on uses of medical and peer review information: are high technology and confidentiality on a collision course?
Brown LC; Stanton WC; Paye W
Whittier Law Rev; 1997; 19(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 12071205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Antitrust law: a remedy for poor peer review.
Peacock EE
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1996 Mar; 81(3):35-40. PubMed ID: 10156758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
Fogel PD; Phillips EJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Applicability of HCQIA continues to confuse litigants and counsel.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1998 Aug; 15(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 10182074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Preserve immunity with proper peer review procedures.
Regan J; Hadley E; Pursell R
Tenn Med; 2010 Jan; 103(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 20108867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. To review or not to review: antitrust liabilities and peer review protections.
Acevedo LJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):321-36, 351-2. PubMed ID: 10138598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Liability for peer review.
Johnson LJ
Med Econ; 2002 Aug; 79(16):80. PubMed ID: 12226893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The co-regulation of medical discipline: challenging medical peer review.
Thomas D
J Law Med; 2004 Feb; 11(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 15018214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review and antitrust.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):496-8. PubMed ID: 9103804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review: federal and state protection.
Kennedy KE
Minn Med; 1996 Mar; 79(3):52-4. PubMed ID: 8839070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Promoting better health care: policy arguments for concurrent quality assurance and attorney-client hospital incident report privileges.
Dollar CJ
Health Matrix Clevel; 1993; 3(1):259-308. PubMed ID: 10138438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What's new with peer review?
Morrow JA
Mo Med; 1995 Dec; 92(12):723-6. PubMed ID: 8587563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review complements QI efforts.
O'Leary DS
Jt Comm Perspect; 1991; 11(4):2-3, 5. PubMed ID: 10120864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Time to reconsider "without cause" provisions in employment contracts.
Isackson C; Meinhardt R
J Med Pract Manage; 1999; 15(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 15318440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New "mental models" for credentialing and peer review.
Brown LC
Health Syst Rev; 1994; 27(3):37-9. PubMed ID: 10134513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
