204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15255390)
1. AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months.
Chou CT; Morris HF; Ochi S; Walker L; DesRosiers D
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):134-43. PubMed ID: 15255390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AICRG, Part I: A 6-year multicentered, multidisciplinary clinical study of a new and innovative implant design.
Morris HF; Ochi S; Crum P; Orenstein IH; Winkler S
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):125-33. PubMed ID: 15255389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of laser microtexturing of the dental implant collar on crestal bone levels and peri-implant health.
Botos S; Yousef H; Zweig B; Flinton R; Weiner S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 21691595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ankylos implant system: concept and clinical application.
Nentwig GH
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 15255394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible.
Cochran DL; Bosshardt DD; Grize L; Higginbottom FL; Jones AA; Jung RE; Wieland M; Dard M
J Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 80(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 19335081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing marginal tissue remodeling around implants.
Rompen E; Touati B; Van Dooren E
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):754-7, 759, 761. PubMed ID: 14969212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year.
Shin YK; Han CH; Heo SJ; Kim S; Chun HJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 17066642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influences of microgap and micromotion of implant-abutment interface on marginal bone loss around implant neck.
Liu Y; Wang J
Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Nov; 83():153-160. PubMed ID: 28780384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in crestal bone levels for immediately loaded implants.
Yoo RH; Chuang SK; Erakat MS; Weed M; Dodson TB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16634496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extent of peri-implantitis-associated bone loss.
Fransson C; Wennström J; Tomasi C; Berglundh T
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 36(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 19426183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Caricasulo R; Malchiodi L; Ghensi P; Fantozzi G; Cucchi A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):653-664. PubMed ID: 29761902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New prosthetic restorative features of Ankylos implant system.
Weigl P
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):178-88. PubMed ID: 15255395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report.
Degidi M; Iezzi G; Scarano A; Piattelli A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 18081870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up.
Degidi M; Piattelli A; Gehrke P; Carinci F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 17066638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri-implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bell M; de Melo LG; Bosco AF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):540-7. PubMed ID: 20556253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Leite CM; de Melo LG; Bosco AF
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 21909485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spontaneous early exposure of submerged endosseous implants resulting in crestal bone loss: a clinical evaluation between stage I and stage II surgery.
Tal H; Artzi Z; Moses O; Nemcovsky CE; Kozlovsky A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 11515998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
