These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15255630)

  • 1. Appraisal of abstracts published in volume 45-no.5 supplement-2001 of Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology.
    Bhutkar MV
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2003 Apr; 47(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 15255630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Journal impact factor.
    Kanthraj GR
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2006; 72(4):322-5. PubMed ID: 16880587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
    Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making processes transparent.
    King KM
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2003; 13(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 12703104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Analysis of Factors Predicting Successful Transition From Pancreatology Abstracts to Full Publications.
    Grunwald D; Feuerstein JD; Maier IM; Sheth SG
    Pancreas; 2017 Jan; 46(1):131-134. PubMed ID: 27846141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indian medical journals: a glimpse through Science Citation Index.
    Bhatia RS
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1994 Jul; 42(7):584. PubMed ID: 7868542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation.
    Moed HF
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 19219533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators.
    Pendlebury DA
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19219526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Making an impact: the rise of the impact factor as a measure of journal quality.
    Leff D
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Jan; 105(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 15635340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Presentations of phase 2 clinical trial abstracts at a national oncology meeting: potential implications for subsequent publication in the peer-reviewed literature.
    Markman M
    Oncology; 2006; 71(1-2):146-7. PubMed ID: 17347590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ensuring inclusion of research reports in systematic reviews.
    Dijkers MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S60-9. PubMed ID: 19892076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle.
    Popp RL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(7):1360-1. PubMed ID: 16198856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A rose by any other name is still a rose: assessing journal quality.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2007; 55(4):163-4. PubMed ID: 17678678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence & Methods: a new addition to The Spine Journal.
    Weiner BK
    Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):433. PubMed ID: 19364679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indian journals on malariology.
    Sen BK; Karanjai A; Munshi UM
    Indian J Malariol; 1990 Dec; 27(4):197-204. PubMed ID: 2093002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?
    Rothwell PM; Martyn CN
    Brain; 2000 Sep; 123 ( Pt 9)():1964-9. PubMed ID: 10960059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact factor and the need for its improvement among indexed journals of Pakistan.
    Nasrullah M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Jul; 21(7):387-8. PubMed ID: 21777523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting the record straight.
    Nat Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 10(1):1. PubMed ID: 17189939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.