These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15257495)

  • 1. [Results with the Contour cochlear implant in patients with cochlear otosclerosis].
    Jaekel K; Aschendorff A; Klenzner T; Laszig R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Jul; 83(7):457-60. PubMed ID: 15257495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Otosclerosis: selection of ear for cochlear implantation.
    Matterson AG; O'Leary S; Pinder D; Freidman L; Dowell R; Briggs R
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):438-46. PubMed ID: 17468676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Otosclerosis: mid-term results of cochlear implantation.
    Sainz M; García-Valdecasas J; Garófano M; Ballesteros JM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 17675831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complications and pitfalls of cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: a 6-year follow-up cohort study.
    Sainz M; Garcia-Valdecasas J; Ballesteros JM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1044-8. PubMed ID: 19395988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulation of the facial nerve by intracochlear electrodes in otosclerosis: a computer modeling study.
    Frijns JH; Kalkman RK; Briaire JJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 19574948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal bone histopathology of a patient with a nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Marsh MA; Coker NJ; Jenkins HA
    Am J Otol; 1992 May; 13(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 1609853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults.
    Aschendorff A; Kromeier J; Klenzner T; Laszig R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):75S-79S. PubMed ID: 17496653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The Nucleus Double Array Cochlear Implant: a new concept in obliterated cochlea].
    Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Weber BP; Frohne C; Büchner A; Battmer RD; Parker J; von Wallenberg E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Aug; 78(8):421-8. PubMed ID: 10488461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
    Cushing SL; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1787-91. PubMed ID: 17003731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Clarion cochlear implant--technical principles, initial clinical experiences and results].
    Lenarz T; Battmer RD
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8851112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear implantation in cochlear otosclerosis.
    Marshall AH; Fanning N; Symons S; Shipp D; Chen JM; Nedzelski JM
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Oct; 115(10):1728-33. PubMed ID: 16222185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ineraid cochlear implant in the ossified cochlea: surgical techniques and results.
    Montandon PB; Boëx C; Pelizzone M
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 8572086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [How does a cochlear implant speech processor work?].
    Adunka O; Kiefer J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Nov; 84(11):841-50; quiz 851-4. PubMed ID: 16358193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes of postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients: the short-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids.
    Paasche G; Bockel F; Tasche C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 16868511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complications of cochlear implant surgery in children.
    Kempf HG; Johann K; Weber BP; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S62-3. PubMed ID: 9391600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.