These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Making sense of diagnostic test likelihood ratios. Perera R; Heneghan C ACP J Club; 2007; 146(2):A8-9. PubMed ID: 17335149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining the area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test. Cantor SB; Kattan MW Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):468-70. PubMed ID: 11059479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using evaluations of diagnostic tests: understanding their limitations and making the most of available evidence. Deeks JJ Ann Oncol; 1999 Jul; 10(7):761-8. PubMed ID: 10470421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochran's Q test was useful to assess heterogeneity in likelihood ratios in studies of diagnostic accuracy. Cohen JF; Chalumeau M; Cohen R; Korevaar DA; Khoshnood B; Bossuyt PM J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 25441698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response to letter by Hoaglin: Heterogeneity in likelihood ratios. Cohen JF; Chalumeau M; Bossuyt PM J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():262-3. PubMed ID: 26130493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards evidence-based diagnosis in developing countries: the use of likelihood ratios for robust quick diagnosis. Soltani A; Moayyeri A Ann Saudi Med; 2006; 26(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 16861864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An application of linear mixed effects model to assess the agreement between two methods with replicated observations. Roy A J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):150-73. PubMed ID: 19127473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Basic principles on selection and use of diagnostic tests: properties of diagnostic tests. Carneiro AV Rev Port Cardiol; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1267-74. PubMed ID: 11865687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Commentary on "propagation of uncertainty in bayesian diagnostic test interpretation". Frisch LE; Morrison K South Med J; 2012 Sep; 105(9):460-1. PubMed ID: 22948323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation. Mulherin SA; Miller WC Ann Intern Med; 2002 Oct; 137(7):598-602. PubMed ID: 12353947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Likelihood ratio reporting. Foote RS; Siegel A Mayo Clin Proc; 2005 Apr; 80(4):564-5; author reply 565. PubMed ID: 15819298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Likelihood ratio reporting. Kohn MA; Michaels AD Mayo Clin Proc; 2005 Apr; 80(4):563; author reply 563-4. PubMed ID: 15819297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A primer on measures of treatment effectiveness and diagnostic test performance. Katz DA WMJ; 1999; 98(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 10235061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Likelihood ratios: getting diagnostic testing into perspective. Halkin A; Reichman J; Schwaber M; Paltiel O; Brezis M QJM; 1998 Apr; 91(4):247-58. PubMed ID: 9666947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The complicated business of testing our diagnostic tests! Soman P; Bukhari S J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Oct; 28(5):2138-2140. PubMed ID: 31997100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis. Usher-Smith JA; Sharp SJ; Griffin SJ BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3139. PubMed ID: 27334281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]