These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

624 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15258077)

  • 21. The leaf plot: a novel way of presenting the value of tests.
    Coulthard MG; Coulthard T
    Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Apr; 69(681):205-206. PubMed ID: 30858331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Letter to the Editor on Cohen et al. (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:299-306).
    Hoaglin DC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():261-2. PubMed ID: 26142918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care.
    Mallett S; Halligan S; Thompson M; Collins GS; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e3999. PubMed ID: 22750423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Test research versus diagnostic research.
    Moons KG; Biesheuvel CJ; Grobbee DE
    Clin Chem; 2004 Mar; 50(3):473-6. PubMed ID: 14981027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards.
    Hui SL; Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 9871952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A mixed model approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies with binary test outcome.
    Doebler P; Holling H; Böhning D
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):418-36. PubMed ID: 22582866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. STARD statement: still room for improvement in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):713-4. PubMed ID: 18710968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 9871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Chu H; Guo H
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):201-3. PubMed ID: 19039031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 1): Analysis of the properties of a diagnostic test].
    Cerda L J; Cifuentes A L
    Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Jun; 27(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 20737121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Jones R
    Fam Pract; 2004 Feb; 21(1):3. PubMed ID: 14760035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A procedure for determining whether a simple combination of diagnostic tests may be noninferior to the theoretical optimum combination.
    Jin H; Lu Y
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 18556633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Point and interval estimation of accuracies of a binary medical diagnostic test following group sequential testing.
    Shu Y; Liu A; Li Z
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Jul; 366(1874):2335-45. PubMed ID: 18407894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnosis in General Practice. Using probabilistic reasoning.
    Doust J
    BMJ; 2009 Nov; 339():b3823. PubMed ID: 19887528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interpreting diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM
    Semin Hematol; 2008 Jul; 45(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 18582626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimal Combinations of Diagnostic Tests Based on AUC.
    Huang X; Qin G; Fang Y
    Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):568-76. PubMed ID: 20560934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A randomized trial of ways to describe test accuracy: the effect on physicians' post-test probability estimates.
    Puhan MA; Steurer J; Bachmann LM; ter Riet G
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Aug; 143(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 16061916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test.
    Alonzo TA; Pepe MS
    Stat Med; 1999 Nov; 18(22):2987-3003. PubMed ID: 10544302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How well do health professionals interpret diagnostic information? A systematic review.
    Whiting PF; Davenport C; Jameson C; Burke M; Sterne JA; Hyde C; Ben-Shlomo Y
    BMJ Open; 2015 Jul; 5(7):e008155. PubMed ID: 26220870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.