These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15258085)

  • 1. National screening programme for chlamydia exists in England.
    Fenton KA; LaMontagne DS; Randall S
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7458):172. PubMed ID: 15258085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.
    LaMontagne DS; Fenton KA; Randall S; Anderson S; Carter P
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 15459399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementing a Chlamydia pilot screening programme.
    Gleave T
    Nurs Times; 2002 Dec 10-16; 98(50):34-7. PubMed ID: 12518550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National chlamydia screening programme in England: making progress.
    Fenton KA; Ward H
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):331-3. PubMed ID: 15459397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. England's chlamydia screening programme is inefficient and fragmented, MPs say.
    Mooney H
    BMJ; 2010 Jan; 340():c539. PubMed ID: 20110309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Missed opportunities for chlamydia screening by community pharmacists.
    Dabrera G; Pinson D; Whiteman S
    Sex Health; 2012 Jul; 9(3):297. PubMed ID: 22697148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Opportunistic or population register based programmes for chlamydia screening?
    Bone A; Soldan K; Woodhall S; Clarke J; Gill ON
    BMJ; 2012 Sep; 345():e5887. PubMed ID: 22951560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management of cases testing positive for gonococcal infection in a community-based chlamydia screening programme.
    Downing J; Cook PA; Madden HC; Phillips-Howard PA; Higgins SP; Bellis MA
    Sex Transm Infect; 2010 Nov; 86(6):474-7. PubMed ID: 20940161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chlamydia screening in young people fails to reduce prevalence.
    Mayor S
    BMJ; 2009 Nov; 339():b4736. PubMed ID: 19914952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring inequalities in the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: added value of ACORN, a commercial geodemographic classification tool.
    Sheringham J; Sowden S; Stafford M; Simms I; Raine R
    Sex Health; 2009 Mar; 6(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 19254493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: where next?
    Macintosh M; McKee M
    Public Health; 2013 Jul; 127(7):681-3. PubMed ID: 23809682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008.
    Simms I; Talebi A; Rhia J; Horner P; French RS; Sarah R; Macintosh M
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Aug; 36(8):522-7. PubMed ID: 19455079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. With appropriate incentives, general practice can improve the coverage of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme.
    Ma R
    Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Nov; 56(532):892-3. PubMed ID: 17132369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Dutch Health Council report on screening for Chlamydia: too reserved].
    Dekker JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Apr; 149(16):850-2. PubMed ID: 15868986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Only 15% of young men in England were tested for chlamydia last year despite recommendations.
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2014 Jun; 348():g4121. PubMed ID: 24948665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementing Chlamydia screening programs in juvenile correctional settings: the california experience.
    Miller JL; Samoff E; Bolan G;
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S53-7. PubMed ID: 18449073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A paradox: overscreening of older women for Chlamydia while too few younger women are being tested.
    Berman SM; Satterwhite CL
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Feb; 38(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 21173722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Widespread screening seeks to lower Chlamydia prevalence.
    Donovan P
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(3):135-6. PubMed ID: 1628717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Poor uptake of self-sample collection kits for Chlamydia testing outside primary care.
    Rose SB; Lawton BA; Bromhead C; MacDonald EJ; Elley CR
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2010 Oct; 34(5):517-20. PubMed ID: 21040182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contribution of a urine-based jail screening program to citywide male Chlamydia and gonorrhea case rates in New York City.
    Pathela P; Hennessy RR; Blank S; Parvez F; Franklin W; Schillinger JA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 17989586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.